Youth suicide prevention: A survey of public school superintendents' acceptability of school-based programs

Andrew R. Scherff, Tanya L. Eckert, David N. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

From a random sample of members of the 2000-2001 membership directory of the American Association of School Administrators (AASA), public school administrators' acceptability ratings of three school-based programs for the prevention of adolescent suicide were examined. A total of 210 (46%) respondents examined a description of a suicide prevention program and completed a measure designed to evaluate the acceptability of suicide prevention programs. Three suicide prevention programs were evaluated for their acceptability, and included: (a) school-wide curriculum-based programs presented to students; (b) in-service presentations to school staff; and (c) self-report screening programs for students. The results indicated that superintendents rated the staff in-service training and curriculum-based programs as significantly more acceptable than the school-wide screening program. In addition, the school-wide screening program was rated as significantly more intrusive by school psychologists than the staff in-service training or curriculum-based prevention programs. Limitations of the study and future research directions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)154-169
Number of pages16
JournalSuicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Youth suicide prevention: A survey of public school superintendents' acceptability of school-based programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this