Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives: A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations

The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The significant individual and societal burden of work disability could be reduced if supportive workplace strategies could be added to evidence-based clinical treatment and rehabilitation to improve return-to-work (RTW) and other disability outcomes. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research on workplace interventions to prevent disability, relate these to employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with an expert panel with direct employer experience. Results Evidence from randomized trials and other research designs has shown general support for job modification, RTW coordination, and organizational support, but evidence is still lacking for interventions at a more granular level. Grey literature reports focused mainly on job re-design and work organization. Panel feedback focused on organizational readiness and the beliefs and values of senior managers as critical factors in facilitating changes to disability management practices. While the scientific literature is focused on facilitating improved coping and reducing discomforts for individual workers, the employer-directed grey literature is focused on making group-level changes to policies and procedures. Conclusions Future research might better target employer practices by tying interventions to positive workplace influences and determinants, by developing more participatory interventions and research designs, and by designing interventions that address factors of organizational change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-433
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Literature
Workplace
Return to Work
Practice Management
Research Design
Research
Organizational Innovation
Publications
Industry
Rehabilitation
Research Personnel
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Disability prevention
  • Employer practices
  • Research priorities
  • Workplace interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives : A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations. / The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 417-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8767b05fe4ef4e0e9fc3582141abee3d,
title = "Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives: A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations",
abstract = "Purpose The significant individual and societal burden of work disability could be reduced if supportive workplace strategies could be added to evidence-based clinical treatment and rehabilitation to improve return-to-work (RTW) and other disability outcomes. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research on workplace interventions to prevent disability, relate these to employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with an expert panel with direct employer experience. Results Evidence from randomized trials and other research designs has shown general support for job modification, RTW coordination, and organizational support, but evidence is still lacking for interventions at a more granular level. Grey literature reports focused mainly on job re-design and work organization. Panel feedback focused on organizational readiness and the beliefs and values of senior managers as critical factors in facilitating changes to disability management practices. While the scientific literature is focused on facilitating improved coping and reducing discomforts for individual workers, the employer-directed grey literature is focused on making group-level changes to policies and procedures. Conclusions Future research might better target employer practices by tying interventions to positive workplace influences and determinants, by developing more participatory interventions and research designs, and by designing interventions that address factors of organizational change.",
keywords = "Disability prevention, Employer practices, Research priorities, Workplace interventions",
author = "{The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention} and Kelly Williams-Whitt and Ute B{\"u}ltmann and Benjamin Amick and Fehmidah Munir and Tveito, {Torill H.} and Anema, {Johannes R.} and Amick, {Benjamin C.} and Peter Blanck and Elyssa Besen and Peter Blanck and Boot, {C{\'e}cile R L} and Ute B{\"u}ltmann and Chan, {Chetwyn C H} and Delclos, {George L.} and Kerstin Ekberg and Ehrhart, {Mark G.} and Fassier, {Jean Baptiste} and Michael Feuerstein and David Gimeno and Kristman, {Vicki L.} and Linton, {Steven J.} and Main, {Chris J.} and Fehmidah Munir and Nicholas, {Michael K.} and Glenn Pransky and Shaw, {William S.} and Sullivan, {Michael J.} and Tetrick, {Lois E.} and Tveito, {Torill H.} and Eira Viikari-Juntura and Kelly Williams-Whitt and Young, {Amanda E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-016-9664-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "417--433",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives

T2 - A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations

AU - The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

AU - Williams-Whitt, Kelly

AU - Bültmann, Ute

AU - Amick, Benjamin

AU - Munir, Fehmidah

AU - Tveito, Torill H.

AU - Anema, Johannes R.

AU - Amick, Benjamin C.

AU - Blanck, Peter

AU - Besen, Elyssa

AU - Blanck, Peter

AU - Boot, Cécile R L

AU - Bültmann, Ute

AU - Chan, Chetwyn C H

AU - Delclos, George L.

AU - Ekberg, Kerstin

AU - Ehrhart, Mark G.

AU - Fassier, Jean Baptiste

AU - Feuerstein, Michael

AU - Gimeno, David

AU - Kristman, Vicki L.

AU - Linton, Steven J.

AU - Main, Chris J.

AU - Munir, Fehmidah

AU - Nicholas, Michael K.

AU - Pransky, Glenn

AU - Shaw, William S.

AU - Sullivan, Michael J.

AU - Tetrick, Lois E.

AU - Tveito, Torill H.

AU - Viikari-Juntura, Eira

AU - Williams-Whitt, Kelly

AU - Young, Amanda E.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Purpose The significant individual and societal burden of work disability could be reduced if supportive workplace strategies could be added to evidence-based clinical treatment and rehabilitation to improve return-to-work (RTW) and other disability outcomes. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research on workplace interventions to prevent disability, relate these to employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with an expert panel with direct employer experience. Results Evidence from randomized trials and other research designs has shown general support for job modification, RTW coordination, and organizational support, but evidence is still lacking for interventions at a more granular level. Grey literature reports focused mainly on job re-design and work organization. Panel feedback focused on organizational readiness and the beliefs and values of senior managers as critical factors in facilitating changes to disability management practices. While the scientific literature is focused on facilitating improved coping and reducing discomforts for individual workers, the employer-directed grey literature is focused on making group-level changes to policies and procedures. Conclusions Future research might better target employer practices by tying interventions to positive workplace influences and determinants, by developing more participatory interventions and research designs, and by designing interventions that address factors of organizational change.

AB - Purpose The significant individual and societal burden of work disability could be reduced if supportive workplace strategies could be added to evidence-based clinical treatment and rehabilitation to improve return-to-work (RTW) and other disability outcomes. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research on workplace interventions to prevent disability, relate these to employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with an expert panel with direct employer experience. Results Evidence from randomized trials and other research designs has shown general support for job modification, RTW coordination, and organizational support, but evidence is still lacking for interventions at a more granular level. Grey literature reports focused mainly on job re-design and work organization. Panel feedback focused on organizational readiness and the beliefs and values of senior managers as critical factors in facilitating changes to disability management practices. While the scientific literature is focused on facilitating improved coping and reducing discomforts for individual workers, the employer-directed grey literature is focused on making group-level changes to policies and procedures. Conclusions Future research might better target employer practices by tying interventions to positive workplace influences and determinants, by developing more participatory interventions and research designs, and by designing interventions that address factors of organizational change.

KW - Disability prevention

KW - Employer practices

KW - Research priorities

KW - Workplace interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986550256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986550256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-016-9664-z

DO - 10.1007/s10926-016-9664-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 27614465

AN - SCOPUS:84986550256

VL - 26

SP - 417

EP - 433

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 4

ER -