Workplace accommodations: Occupational therapists as mediators in the interactive process

Naomi Schreuer, William Myhill, Tal Aratan-Bergman, Deepti Samant, Peter Blanck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Employers are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide qualified individuals with disabilities workplace accommodations if needed to enable their performance of essential job functions, maintain successful employment, and effectively contribute to the workforce and society. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and many federal courts recommend an "interactive process" between the employee and employer, to facilitate effective accommodations. Research demonstrates, however, that often the parties to the process are uncertain of their roles and responsibilities. Similarly, court decisions have not uniformly clarified the specific requirements of the interactive process or alternate best practices to achieve an effective outcome. This article asserts that an occupational therapist with special training in ergonomics may make a significant contribution to identifying and implementing effective workplace accommodations, by mediating the interactive process between employer and employee. This unique role is illuminated by examination of the occupational therapist's professional expertise implementing a successful accommodation (case study) contrasted with an unsuccessful accommodation process that required litigation to resolve. Furthermore, we discuss the role of legal mediation principles in the occupational therapist's practice, suggesting ways to improve accommodation outcomes and avoid litigation. Recommendations for future research and practice are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-160
Number of pages12
JournalWork
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence
Workplace
Human Engineering
Practice Guidelines
Research
Occupational Therapists

Keywords

  • Ergonomics
  • Interactive process
  • Mediation
  • Workplace accommodations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Workplace accommodations : Occupational therapists as mediators in the interactive process. / Schreuer, Naomi; Myhill, William; Aratan-Bergman, Tal; Samant, Deepti; Blanck, Peter.

In: Work, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2009, p. 149-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schreuer, Naomi ; Myhill, William ; Aratan-Bergman, Tal ; Samant, Deepti ; Blanck, Peter. / Workplace accommodations : Occupational therapists as mediators in the interactive process. In: Work. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 149-160.
@article{999bf761c8ee4254981acffb055ad72c,
title = "Workplace accommodations: Occupational therapists as mediators in the interactive process",
abstract = "Employers are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide qualified individuals with disabilities workplace accommodations if needed to enable their performance of essential job functions, maintain successful employment, and effectively contribute to the workforce and society. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and many federal courts recommend an {"}interactive process{"} between the employee and employer, to facilitate effective accommodations. Research demonstrates, however, that often the parties to the process are uncertain of their roles and responsibilities. Similarly, court decisions have not uniformly clarified the specific requirements of the interactive process or alternate best practices to achieve an effective outcome. This article asserts that an occupational therapist with special training in ergonomics may make a significant contribution to identifying and implementing effective workplace accommodations, by mediating the interactive process between employer and employee. This unique role is illuminated by examination of the occupational therapist's professional expertise implementing a successful accommodation (case study) contrasted with an unsuccessful accommodation process that required litigation to resolve. Furthermore, we discuss the role of legal mediation principles in the occupational therapist's practice, suggesting ways to improve accommodation outcomes and avoid litigation. Recommendations for future research and practice are presented.",
keywords = "Ergonomics, Interactive process, Mediation, Workplace accommodations",
author = "Naomi Schreuer and William Myhill and Tal Aratan-Bergman and Deepti Samant and Peter Blanck",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.3233/WOR-2009-0913",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "149--160",
journal = "Work",
issn = "1051-9815",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workplace accommodations

T2 - Occupational therapists as mediators in the interactive process

AU - Schreuer, Naomi

AU - Myhill, William

AU - Aratan-Bergman, Tal

AU - Samant, Deepti

AU - Blanck, Peter

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Employers are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide qualified individuals with disabilities workplace accommodations if needed to enable their performance of essential job functions, maintain successful employment, and effectively contribute to the workforce and society. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and many federal courts recommend an "interactive process" between the employee and employer, to facilitate effective accommodations. Research demonstrates, however, that often the parties to the process are uncertain of their roles and responsibilities. Similarly, court decisions have not uniformly clarified the specific requirements of the interactive process or alternate best practices to achieve an effective outcome. This article asserts that an occupational therapist with special training in ergonomics may make a significant contribution to identifying and implementing effective workplace accommodations, by mediating the interactive process between employer and employee. This unique role is illuminated by examination of the occupational therapist's professional expertise implementing a successful accommodation (case study) contrasted with an unsuccessful accommodation process that required litigation to resolve. Furthermore, we discuss the role of legal mediation principles in the occupational therapist's practice, suggesting ways to improve accommodation outcomes and avoid litigation. Recommendations for future research and practice are presented.

AB - Employers are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide qualified individuals with disabilities workplace accommodations if needed to enable their performance of essential job functions, maintain successful employment, and effectively contribute to the workforce and society. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and many federal courts recommend an "interactive process" between the employee and employer, to facilitate effective accommodations. Research demonstrates, however, that often the parties to the process are uncertain of their roles and responsibilities. Similarly, court decisions have not uniformly clarified the specific requirements of the interactive process or alternate best practices to achieve an effective outcome. This article asserts that an occupational therapist with special training in ergonomics may make a significant contribution to identifying and implementing effective workplace accommodations, by mediating the interactive process between employer and employee. This unique role is illuminated by examination of the occupational therapist's professional expertise implementing a successful accommodation (case study) contrasted with an unsuccessful accommodation process that required litigation to resolve. Furthermore, we discuss the role of legal mediation principles in the occupational therapist's practice, suggesting ways to improve accommodation outcomes and avoid litigation. Recommendations for future research and practice are presented.

KW - Ergonomics

KW - Interactive process

KW - Mediation

KW - Workplace accommodations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649145992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649145992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/WOR-2009-0913

DO - 10.3233/WOR-2009-0913

M3 - Article

C2 - 20037228

AN - SCOPUS:77649145992

VL - 34

SP - 149

EP - 160

JO - Work

JF - Work

SN - 1051-9815

IS - 2

ER -