Who needs environmental monitoring?

Gary M. Lovett, Douglas A. Burns, Charles T. Driscoll, Jennifer C. Jenkins, Myron J. Mitchell, Lindsey Rustad, James B. Shanley, Gene E. Likens, Richard Haeuber

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

289 Scopus citations

Abstract

Environmental monitoring is often criticized as being unscientific, too expensive, and wasteful. While some monitoring studies do suffer from these problems, there are also many highly successful long-term monitoring programs that have provided important scientific advances and crucial information for environmental policy. Here, we discuss the characteristics of effective monitoring programs, and contend that monitoring should be considered a fundamental component of environmental science and policy. We urge scientists who develop monitoring programs to plan in advance to ensure high data quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, and we urge government agencies and other funding institutions to make greater commitments to increasing the amount and long-term stability of funding for environmental monitoring programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-260
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Who needs environmental monitoring?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lovett, G. M., Burns, D. A., Driscoll, C. T., Jenkins, J. C., Mitchell, M. J., Rustad, L., Shanley, J. B., Likens, G. E., & Haeuber, R. (2007). Who needs environmental monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(5), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[253:WNEM]2.0.CO;2