What happened to Soviet security studies? An essay on the state of the field

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Security issues were a central part of Soviet studies. This article considers how the study of security issues has changed with respect to Russia and Eurasia since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union. It highlights a series of positive changes: a broadening of vision beyond Moscow, more engagement with mainstream social science, greater attention to security issues internal to post-Soviet states, and the creation of an expert community that spans North America, Europe, and Eurasia. At the same time, I argue that scholarship on Russian and Eurasian security issues has become less strategic, in the sense this word is used by Richard Betts - about the interaction of political ends and military means, rooted in an appreciation of military science. The academy, especially in North America, has become a less welcoming place for scholars working on Russia and Eurasia who care about previously central issues in the field such as nuclear strategy, weapons procurement, military doctrine, and defense planning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-210
Number of pages15
JournalRussian Politics
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

military science
Russia
military doctrine
weapon
cold war
academy
USSR
social science
Military
expert
planning
interaction
community
Eurasia
Post-Soviet
Procurement
Social Sciences
Doctrine
Planning
Interaction

Keywords

  • Eurasia
  • Russian studies
  • Security studies
  • Soviet studies
  • Strategic studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

What happened to Soviet security studies? An essay on the state of the field. / Taylor, Brian D.

In: Russian Politics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 196-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{193bacaf96df4f24bf058073575d4572,
title = "What happened to Soviet security studies?: An essay on the state of the field",
abstract = "Security issues were a central part of Soviet studies. This article considers how the study of security issues has changed with respect to Russia and Eurasia since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union. It highlights a series of positive changes: a broadening of vision beyond Moscow, more engagement with mainstream social science, greater attention to security issues internal to post-Soviet states, and the creation of an expert community that spans North America, Europe, and Eurasia. At the same time, I argue that scholarship on Russian and Eurasian security issues has become less strategic, in the sense this word is used by Richard Betts - about the interaction of political ends and military means, rooted in an appreciation of military science. The academy, especially in North America, has become a less welcoming place for scholars working on Russia and Eurasia who care about previously central issues in the field such as nuclear strategy, weapons procurement, military doctrine, and defense planning.",
keywords = "Eurasia, Russian studies, Security studies, Soviet studies, Strategic studies",
author = "Taylor, {Brian D}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/2451-8921-00402003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "196--210",
journal = "Russian Politics",
issn = "2451-8913",
publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What happened to Soviet security studies?

T2 - An essay on the state of the field

AU - Taylor, Brian D

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Security issues were a central part of Soviet studies. This article considers how the study of security issues has changed with respect to Russia and Eurasia since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union. It highlights a series of positive changes: a broadening of vision beyond Moscow, more engagement with mainstream social science, greater attention to security issues internal to post-Soviet states, and the creation of an expert community that spans North America, Europe, and Eurasia. At the same time, I argue that scholarship on Russian and Eurasian security issues has become less strategic, in the sense this word is used by Richard Betts - about the interaction of political ends and military means, rooted in an appreciation of military science. The academy, especially in North America, has become a less welcoming place for scholars working on Russia and Eurasia who care about previously central issues in the field such as nuclear strategy, weapons procurement, military doctrine, and defense planning.

AB - Security issues were a central part of Soviet studies. This article considers how the study of security issues has changed with respect to Russia and Eurasia since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union. It highlights a series of positive changes: a broadening of vision beyond Moscow, more engagement with mainstream social science, greater attention to security issues internal to post-Soviet states, and the creation of an expert community that spans North America, Europe, and Eurasia. At the same time, I argue that scholarship on Russian and Eurasian security issues has become less strategic, in the sense this word is used by Richard Betts - about the interaction of political ends and military means, rooted in an appreciation of military science. The academy, especially in North America, has become a less welcoming place for scholars working on Russia and Eurasia who care about previously central issues in the field such as nuclear strategy, weapons procurement, military doctrine, and defense planning.

KW - Eurasia

KW - Russian studies

KW - Security studies

KW - Soviet studies

KW - Strategic studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068105416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068105416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/2451-8921-00402003

DO - 10.1163/2451-8921-00402003

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85068105416

VL - 4

SP - 196

EP - 210

JO - Russian Politics

JF - Russian Politics

SN - 2451-8913

IS - 2

ER -