Welfare for the wealthy: Parties, social spending, and inequality in the United States

Research output: Book/ReportBook

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy reexamines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a tradeoff between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages251
ISBN (Print)9781316181607, 9781107101012
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

welfare
social expenditures
income
Federal Government
subsidy
money
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Welfare for the wealthy : Parties, social spending, and inequality in the United States. / Faricy, Christopher George.

Cambridge University Press, 2015. 251 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

@book{2bc07b76ec5243c19f77d45c63472ead,
title = "Welfare for the wealthy: Parties, social spending, and inequality in the United States",
abstract = "How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy reexamines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a tradeoff between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.",
author = "Faricy, {Christopher George}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781316181607",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781316181607",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Welfare for the wealthy

T2 - Parties, social spending, and inequality in the United States

AU - Faricy, Christopher George

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy reexamines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a tradeoff between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

AB - How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy reexamines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a tradeoff between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953888184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953888184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781316181607

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781316181607

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:84953888184

SN - 9781316181607

SN - 9781107101012

BT - Welfare for the wealthy

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -