Virtual interorganizational relationships in business-to-business electronic markets: heterogeneity in the effects of organizational interdependence on relational outcomes

Girish Mallapragada, Rajdeep Grewal, Raj Mehta, Ravi Dharwadkar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Business-to-business electronic markets have emerged as robust, legitimate channels for conducting transactions, where firms participate in these markets according to their investments in the channel, such that they might participate as an expert, explorer, or passive firm. Over time, repeated interactions with the same trading partners can result in virtual interorganizational relationships even in an environment predicated to promote transactional exchange. We suggest that the nature of firm participation should moderate the influence of organizational interdependence—which comprises both total interdependence and interdependent asymmetry—on relational outcomes such as trust and satisfaction for virtual interorganizational relationships that arise in the electronic market. Results from analysis of data collected from a survey of participant firms in an electronic market confirm the moderating role of the nature of participation. Across the three participation states, total interdependence enhances relational outcomes at a diminishing rate. In contrast, interdependence asymmetry does not influence relational outcomes for expert firms, diminishes them at an increasing rate for explorer firms, and increases trust at a decreasing rate for passive firms. The interaction between total interdependence and interdependence asymmetry increased satisfaction for expert firms and decreased trust and satisfaction for explorer firms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-628
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 26 2014

Fingerprint

Interorganizational relationships
Business to business
Interdependence
Electronic markets
Participation
Asymmetry
Interaction
Repeated interaction

Keywords

  • Electronic markets
  • Interdependence
  • Interorganizational relationships
  • Organizational interdependence
  • Relational assets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{581c0b6019864012b28aa9c80ba6aac8,
title = "Virtual interorganizational relationships in business-to-business electronic markets: heterogeneity in the effects of organizational interdependence on relational outcomes",
abstract = "Business-to-business electronic markets have emerged as robust, legitimate channels for conducting transactions, where firms participate in these markets according to their investments in the channel, such that they might participate as an expert, explorer, or passive firm. Over time, repeated interactions with the same trading partners can result in virtual interorganizational relationships even in an environment predicated to promote transactional exchange. We suggest that the nature of firm participation should moderate the influence of organizational interdependence—which comprises both total interdependence and interdependent asymmetry—on relational outcomes such as trust and satisfaction for virtual interorganizational relationships that arise in the electronic market. Results from analysis of data collected from a survey of participant firms in an electronic market confirm the moderating role of the nature of participation. Across the three participation states, total interdependence enhances relational outcomes at a diminishing rate. In contrast, interdependence asymmetry does not influence relational outcomes for expert firms, diminishes them at an increasing rate for explorer firms, and increases trust at a decreasing rate for passive firms. The interaction between total interdependence and interdependence asymmetry increased satisfaction for expert firms and decreased trust and satisfaction for explorer firms.",
keywords = "Electronic markets, Interdependence, Interorganizational relationships, Organizational interdependence, Relational assets",
author = "Girish Mallapragada and Rajdeep Grewal and Raj Mehta and Ravi Dharwadkar",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1007/s11747-014-0411-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "610--628",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science",
issn = "0092-0703",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Virtual interorganizational relationships in business-to-business electronic markets

T2 - heterogeneity in the effects of organizational interdependence on relational outcomes

AU - Mallapragada, Girish

AU - Grewal, Rajdeep

AU - Mehta, Raj

AU - Dharwadkar, Ravi

PY - 2014/10/26

Y1 - 2014/10/26

N2 - Business-to-business electronic markets have emerged as robust, legitimate channels for conducting transactions, where firms participate in these markets according to their investments in the channel, such that they might participate as an expert, explorer, or passive firm. Over time, repeated interactions with the same trading partners can result in virtual interorganizational relationships even in an environment predicated to promote transactional exchange. We suggest that the nature of firm participation should moderate the influence of organizational interdependence—which comprises both total interdependence and interdependent asymmetry—on relational outcomes such as trust and satisfaction for virtual interorganizational relationships that arise in the electronic market. Results from analysis of data collected from a survey of participant firms in an electronic market confirm the moderating role of the nature of participation. Across the three participation states, total interdependence enhances relational outcomes at a diminishing rate. In contrast, interdependence asymmetry does not influence relational outcomes for expert firms, diminishes them at an increasing rate for explorer firms, and increases trust at a decreasing rate for passive firms. The interaction between total interdependence and interdependence asymmetry increased satisfaction for expert firms and decreased trust and satisfaction for explorer firms.

AB - Business-to-business electronic markets have emerged as robust, legitimate channels for conducting transactions, where firms participate in these markets according to their investments in the channel, such that they might participate as an expert, explorer, or passive firm. Over time, repeated interactions with the same trading partners can result in virtual interorganizational relationships even in an environment predicated to promote transactional exchange. We suggest that the nature of firm participation should moderate the influence of organizational interdependence—which comprises both total interdependence and interdependent asymmetry—on relational outcomes such as trust and satisfaction for virtual interorganizational relationships that arise in the electronic market. Results from analysis of data collected from a survey of participant firms in an electronic market confirm the moderating role of the nature of participation. Across the three participation states, total interdependence enhances relational outcomes at a diminishing rate. In contrast, interdependence asymmetry does not influence relational outcomes for expert firms, diminishes them at an increasing rate for explorer firms, and increases trust at a decreasing rate for passive firms. The interaction between total interdependence and interdependence asymmetry increased satisfaction for expert firms and decreased trust and satisfaction for explorer firms.

KW - Electronic markets

KW - Interdependence

KW - Interorganizational relationships

KW - Organizational interdependence

KW - Relational assets

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938748715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938748715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11747-014-0411-8

DO - 10.1007/s11747-014-0411-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938748715

VL - 43

SP - 610

EP - 628

JO - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

JF - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

SN - 0092-0703

IS - 5

ER -