Unlocking insights about military children and families

Anita Chandra, Andrew S London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As this issue of the Future of Children makes clear, we have much yet to learn about military children and their families. A big part of the reason, write Anita Chandra and Andrew London, is that we lack sufficiently robust sources of data. Until we collect more and better data about military families, Chandra and London say, we will not be able to study the breadth of their experiences and sources of resilience, distinguish among subgroups within the diverse military community, or compare military children with their civilian counterparts. After surveying the available sources of data and explaining what they are lacking and why, Chandra and London make several recommendations. First, they say, major longitudinal national surveys, as well as administrative data systems (for example, in health care and in schools), should routinely ask about children's connections to the military, so that military families can be flagged in statistical analyses. Second, questions on national surveys and psychological assessments should be formulated and calibrated for military children to be certain that they resonate with military culture. Third, researchers who study military children should consider adopting a life-course perspective, examining children from birth to adulthood as they and their families move through the transitions of military life and into or out of the civilian world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-198
Number of pages12
JournalFuture of Children
Volume23
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Military
Information Storage and Retrieval
Information Systems
Longitudinal Studies
Research Personnel
Parturition
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care
adulthood
resilience
health care
lack
school
community
Military Family
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Health(social science)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Unlocking insights about military children and families. / Chandra, Anita; London, Andrew S.

In: Future of Children, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2013, p. 187-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e01400900e804663b4925c6458a6df25,
title = "Unlocking insights about military children and families",
abstract = "As this issue of the Future of Children makes clear, we have much yet to learn about military children and their families. A big part of the reason, write Anita Chandra and Andrew London, is that we lack sufficiently robust sources of data. Until we collect more and better data about military families, Chandra and London say, we will not be able to study the breadth of their experiences and sources of resilience, distinguish among subgroups within the diverse military community, or compare military children with their civilian counterparts. After surveying the available sources of data and explaining what they are lacking and why, Chandra and London make several recommendations. First, they say, major longitudinal national surveys, as well as administrative data systems (for example, in health care and in schools), should routinely ask about children's connections to the military, so that military families can be flagged in statistical analyses. Second, questions on national surveys and psychological assessments should be formulated and calibrated for military children to be certain that they resonate with military culture. Third, researchers who study military children should consider adopting a life-course perspective, examining children from birth to adulthood as they and their families move through the transitions of military life and into or out of the civilian world.",
author = "Anita Chandra and London, {Andrew S}",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "187--198",
journal = "Future of Children",
issn = "1054-8289",
publisher = "Center for the Future of Children",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unlocking insights about military children and families

AU - Chandra, Anita

AU - London, Andrew S

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - As this issue of the Future of Children makes clear, we have much yet to learn about military children and their families. A big part of the reason, write Anita Chandra and Andrew London, is that we lack sufficiently robust sources of data. Until we collect more and better data about military families, Chandra and London say, we will not be able to study the breadth of their experiences and sources of resilience, distinguish among subgroups within the diverse military community, or compare military children with their civilian counterparts. After surveying the available sources of data and explaining what they are lacking and why, Chandra and London make several recommendations. First, they say, major longitudinal national surveys, as well as administrative data systems (for example, in health care and in schools), should routinely ask about children's connections to the military, so that military families can be flagged in statistical analyses. Second, questions on national surveys and psychological assessments should be formulated and calibrated for military children to be certain that they resonate with military culture. Third, researchers who study military children should consider adopting a life-course perspective, examining children from birth to adulthood as they and their families move through the transitions of military life and into or out of the civilian world.

AB - As this issue of the Future of Children makes clear, we have much yet to learn about military children and their families. A big part of the reason, write Anita Chandra and Andrew London, is that we lack sufficiently robust sources of data. Until we collect more and better data about military families, Chandra and London say, we will not be able to study the breadth of their experiences and sources of resilience, distinguish among subgroups within the diverse military community, or compare military children with their civilian counterparts. After surveying the available sources of data and explaining what they are lacking and why, Chandra and London make several recommendations. First, they say, major longitudinal national surveys, as well as administrative data systems (for example, in health care and in schools), should routinely ask about children's connections to the military, so that military families can be flagged in statistical analyses. Second, questions on national surveys and psychological assessments should be formulated and calibrated for military children to be certain that they resonate with military culture. Third, researchers who study military children should consider adopting a life-course perspective, examining children from birth to adulthood as they and their families move through the transitions of military life and into or out of the civilian world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885033840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885033840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25518698

AN - SCOPUS:84885033840

VL - 23

SP - 187

EP - 198

JO - Future of Children

JF - Future of Children

SN - 1054-8289

IS - 2

ER -