Uncertain R & D and the Porter hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ever since Michael Porter proposed that environmental regulations can improve competitiveness, much economic research has examined the potential for such outcomes. Attempts to model Porter hypothesis outcomes in a way consistent with neoclassical economics have focused on things such as strategic relationships between firms, moral hazard problems, and economies of scale. In this paper, I offer a simpler alternative. The results of any R&D project are uncertain. Calibrating a simple model of induced R&D with uncertainty so that the expected value of research is only positive with environmental policy, I find that between 8 and 24 percent of simulations result in cases where post-regulation profits are higher than pre-regulation profits. This result is consistent both with Porter finding specific cases with complete innovation offsets and with macro-level findings that environmental policy is not costless. I conclude by discussing the implication of these results for environmental policy and future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalContributions to Economic Analysis and Policy
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Uncertain R & D and the Porter hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this