TY - JOUR
T1 - Tutorial
T2 - Speech motor chaining treatment for school-age children with speech sound disorders
AU - Preston, Jonathan L.
AU - Leece, Megan C.
AU - Storto, Jaclyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Purpose: Operationalized treatments for school-age children with speech sound disorders may result in more replicable and evidence-based interventions. This tutorial describes Speech Motor Chaining (SMC) procedures, which are designed to build complex speech around core movements by incorporating several principles of motor learning. The procedures systematically manipulate factors such as feedback type and frequency, practice variability, and stimulus complexity based on the child’s performance. Method: The rationale and procedures for SMC are described. Examples are presented of how to design stimuli, deliver feedback, and adapt the approach. Free resources are provided to guide clinicians through implementation of the procedure. Data on fidelity of implementation and dose per session are presented. Clinical and research evidence is provided to illustrate likely outcomes with the procedure. Results: SMC is a method that can result in successful acquisition of target speech patterns and generalization to untrained words. Most clinicians can implement the procedure with over 90% fidelity, and most children can achieve over 200 trials per session. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers can use or adapt the operationally defined SMC procedures to incorporate several principles of motor learning into treatment for school-age children with speech sound disorders.
AB - Purpose: Operationalized treatments for school-age children with speech sound disorders may result in more replicable and evidence-based interventions. This tutorial describes Speech Motor Chaining (SMC) procedures, which are designed to build complex speech around core movements by incorporating several principles of motor learning. The procedures systematically manipulate factors such as feedback type and frequency, practice variability, and stimulus complexity based on the child’s performance. Method: The rationale and procedures for SMC are described. Examples are presented of how to design stimuli, deliver feedback, and adapt the approach. Free resources are provided to guide clinicians through implementation of the procedure. Data on fidelity of implementation and dose per session are presented. Clinical and research evidence is provided to illustrate likely outcomes with the procedure. Results: SMC is a method that can result in successful acquisition of target speech patterns and generalization to untrained words. Most clinicians can implement the procedure with over 90% fidelity, and most children can achieve over 200 trials per session. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers can use or adapt the operationally defined SMC procedures to incorporate several principles of motor learning into treatment for school-age children with speech sound disorders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069888939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069888939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0081
DO - 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0081
M3 - Article
C2 - 31051085
AN - SCOPUS:85069888939
SN - 0161-1461
VL - 50
SP - 343
EP - 355
JO - Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
JF - Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
IS - 3
ER -