TY - JOUR
T1 - Trait and plasticity evolution under competition and mutualism in evolving pairwise yeast communities
AU - Wang, Sheng Pei
AU - Agarwal, Renuka
AU - Segraves, Kari A.
AU - Althoff, David M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Although we have a good understanding of how phenotypic plasticity evolves in response to abiotic environments, we know comparatively less about responses to biotic interactions. We experimentally tested how competition and mutualism affected trait and plasticity evolution of pairwise communities of genetically modified brewer’s yeast. We quantified evolutionary changes in growth rate, resource use efficiency (RUE), and their plasticity in strains evolving alone, with a competitor, and with a mutualist. Compared to their ancestors, strains evolving alone had lower RUE and RUE plasticity. There was also an evolutionary tradeoff between changes in growth rate and RUE in strains evolving alone, suggesting selection for increased growth rate at the cost of efficiency. Strains evolving with a competitive partner had higher growth rates, slightly lower RUE, and a stronger tradeoff between growth rate and efficiency. In contrast, mutualism had opposite effects on trait evolution. Strains evolving with a mutualist had slightly lower growth rates, higher RUE, and a weak evolutionary tradeoff between growth rate and RUE. Despite their different effects on trait evolution, competition and mutualism had little effect on plasticity evolution for either trait, suggesting that abiotic factors could be more important than biotic factors in generating selection for plasticity. They are the events that are more pronounced under rare resources and severe conditions, as well as the direct interactions that can arise between species, where deficiencies and selective pressures can yield a variety of adaptive changes. The effects of biotic interactions on ecological dynamics in a microenvironment can often lead to phenomena generally understood as co-evolution, considering the genetic aspect as well as individual capability to adapt through plasticity in response to micro-patterning of available resources.
AB - Although we have a good understanding of how phenotypic plasticity evolves in response to abiotic environments, we know comparatively less about responses to biotic interactions. We experimentally tested how competition and mutualism affected trait and plasticity evolution of pairwise communities of genetically modified brewer’s yeast. We quantified evolutionary changes in growth rate, resource use efficiency (RUE), and their plasticity in strains evolving alone, with a competitor, and with a mutualist. Compared to their ancestors, strains evolving alone had lower RUE and RUE plasticity. There was also an evolutionary tradeoff between changes in growth rate and RUE in strains evolving alone, suggesting selection for increased growth rate at the cost of efficiency. Strains evolving with a competitive partner had higher growth rates, slightly lower RUE, and a stronger tradeoff between growth rate and efficiency. In contrast, mutualism had opposite effects on trait evolution. Strains evolving with a mutualist had slightly lower growth rates, higher RUE, and a weak evolutionary tradeoff between growth rate and RUE. Despite their different effects on trait evolution, competition and mutualism had little effect on plasticity evolution for either trait, suggesting that abiotic factors could be more important than biotic factors in generating selection for plasticity. They are the events that are more pronounced under rare resources and severe conditions, as well as the direct interactions that can arise between species, where deficiencies and selective pressures can yield a variety of adaptive changes. The effects of biotic interactions on ecological dynamics in a microenvironment can often lead to phenomena generally understood as co-evolution, considering the genetic aspect as well as individual capability to adapt through plasticity in response to micro-patterning of available resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215083903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85215083903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0311674
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0311674
M3 - Article
C2 - 39813196
AN - SCOPUS:85215083903
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 1
M1 - e0311674
ER -