Toward the Anthropological Study of Cognitive Performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the logical and empirical basis for cognitive analysis in anthropology. A review of the assumptions that cognitive anthropology makes about the nature of human cognition and behavior is followed by a critical discussion focusing on four problems: (1) the psychological reality of analyses, (2) the competence versus performance dichotomy, (3) the sharedness of cognitive systems, and (4) explanatory perspective in cognitive anthropology. This discussion concludes that as presently constituted, cognitive anthropology does not take us toward the goal of producing an adequate account of cognitive performance. Evolutionary structuralism, which appears to be a viable approach toward this goal is outlined, its major points are discussed, and its implications for continued research are elaborated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)677-703
Number of pages27
JournalHuman Relations
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cognitive systems
anthropology
performance
structuralism
cognition
Cognitive Performance
Cognitive Anthropology
Anthropology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Toward the Anthropological Study of Cognitive Performance. / Rubinstein, Robert A.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 34, No. 8, 1981, p. 677-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbef3f5888394a71bb8af99b45128086,
title = "Toward the Anthropological Study of Cognitive Performance",
abstract = "This paper examines the logical and empirical basis for cognitive analysis in anthropology. A review of the assumptions that cognitive anthropology makes about the nature of human cognition and behavior is followed by a critical discussion focusing on four problems: (1) the psychological reality of analyses, (2) the competence versus performance dichotomy, (3) the sharedness of cognitive systems, and (4) explanatory perspective in cognitive anthropology. This discussion concludes that as presently constituted, cognitive anthropology does not take us toward the goal of producing an adequate account of cognitive performance. Evolutionary structuralism, which appears to be a viable approach toward this goal is outlined, its major points are discussed, and its implications for continued research are elaborated.",
author = "Rubinstein, {Robert A.}",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1177/001872678103400804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "677--703",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward the Anthropological Study of Cognitive Performance

AU - Rubinstein, Robert A.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - This paper examines the logical and empirical basis for cognitive analysis in anthropology. A review of the assumptions that cognitive anthropology makes about the nature of human cognition and behavior is followed by a critical discussion focusing on four problems: (1) the psychological reality of analyses, (2) the competence versus performance dichotomy, (3) the sharedness of cognitive systems, and (4) explanatory perspective in cognitive anthropology. This discussion concludes that as presently constituted, cognitive anthropology does not take us toward the goal of producing an adequate account of cognitive performance. Evolutionary structuralism, which appears to be a viable approach toward this goal is outlined, its major points are discussed, and its implications for continued research are elaborated.

AB - This paper examines the logical and empirical basis for cognitive analysis in anthropology. A review of the assumptions that cognitive anthropology makes about the nature of human cognition and behavior is followed by a critical discussion focusing on four problems: (1) the psychological reality of analyses, (2) the competence versus performance dichotomy, (3) the sharedness of cognitive systems, and (4) explanatory perspective in cognitive anthropology. This discussion concludes that as presently constituted, cognitive anthropology does not take us toward the goal of producing an adequate account of cognitive performance. Evolutionary structuralism, which appears to be a viable approach toward this goal is outlined, its major points are discussed, and its implications for continued research are elaborated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964113206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964113206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872678103400804

DO - 10.1177/001872678103400804

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964113206

VL - 34

SP - 677

EP - 703

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 8

ER -