TY - JOUR
T1 - The web and the pyramid
T2 - Hope Olson's vision of connectedness in a world of hierarchies
AU - Kwaśnik, Barbara H.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Hope Olson's mission is to analyze our traditional knowledge-representation systems from the point of view of those whose voices are not well reflected. Her focus is not only on the content of these schemes but also, and perhaps especially, on their structures. There is no structure more established than the hierarchy and yet the hierarchy makes assumptions and imposes rules that have shaped our world view. In her 2007 library Trends article, "How We Construct Subjects: A Feminist Analysis," she takes apart the the notions behind hierarchies and brings to bear feminist thinking to offer a penetrating critique followed by a careful evaluation of implications. By way of examples she explores several existing schemes: The Dewey Decimal Classification, thesauri, and the library of Congress Subject Headings to demonstrate how there do exist ameliorating (non hierarchical) techniques, but how they do not adequately solve the problem. Having laid out the limitations of our existing tools, both in content and in structure, she suggests rewriting and restructuring our schemes so that the all-important connections are visible - a web instead of a hierarchy. The article, written almost a decade ago, continues to be prophetic of what modern approaches and ways of thinking can achieve. As such, an analysis of the article serves here as a way of explicating Hope's rich and penetrating intellectual contributions and her critical yet hopeful vision.
AB - Hope Olson's mission is to analyze our traditional knowledge-representation systems from the point of view of those whose voices are not well reflected. Her focus is not only on the content of these schemes but also, and perhaps especially, on their structures. There is no structure more established than the hierarchy and yet the hierarchy makes assumptions and imposes rules that have shaped our world view. In her 2007 library Trends article, "How We Construct Subjects: A Feminist Analysis," she takes apart the the notions behind hierarchies and brings to bear feminist thinking to offer a penetrating critique followed by a careful evaluation of implications. By way of examples she explores several existing schemes: The Dewey Decimal Classification, thesauri, and the library of Congress Subject Headings to demonstrate how there do exist ameliorating (non hierarchical) techniques, but how they do not adequately solve the problem. Having laid out the limitations of our existing tools, both in content and in structure, she suggests rewriting and restructuring our schemes so that the all-important connections are visible - a web instead of a hierarchy. The article, written almost a decade ago, continues to be prophetic of what modern approaches and ways of thinking can achieve. As such, an analysis of the article serves here as a way of explicating Hope's rich and penetrating intellectual contributions and her critical yet hopeful vision.
KW - Element
KW - Hierarchies
KW - Hope Olson
KW - Structure
KW - Work
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981294701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981294701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-367
DO - 10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-367
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84981294701
SN - 0943-7444
VL - 43
SP - 367
EP - 372
JO - Knowledge Organization
JF - Knowledge Organization
IS - 5
ER -