The value of the specialist

Empirical evidence from the CBOE

Amber Anand, Daniel G. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the "natural experiment" of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-118
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Financial Markets
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Empirical evidence
Exchange option
Investors
Order flow
Uncertainty
Effective spread
Savings
Natural experiment
Demand uncertainty
Market share
Market makers

Keywords

  • Bid-ask spreads
  • Competition
  • Market makers
  • Options
  • Specialists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

The value of the specialist : Empirical evidence from the CBOE. / Anand, Amber; Weaver, Daniel G.

In: Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 9, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 100-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a6309c8a0684bbeacd7a864a815e63e,
title = "The value of the specialist: Empirical evidence from the CBOE",
abstract = "Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the {"}natural experiment{"} of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow.",
keywords = "Bid-ask spreads, Competition, Market makers, Options, Specialists",
author = "Amber Anand and Weaver, {Daniel G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.finmar.2005.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "100--118",
journal = "Journal of Financial Markets",
issn = "1386-4181",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of the specialist

T2 - Empirical evidence from the CBOE

AU - Anand, Amber

AU - Weaver, Daniel G.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the "natural experiment" of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow.

AB - Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the "natural experiment" of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow.

KW - Bid-ask spreads

KW - Competition

KW - Market makers

KW - Options

KW - Specialists

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646086723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646086723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.finmar.2005.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.finmar.2005.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 100

EP - 118

JO - Journal of Financial Markets

JF - Journal of Financial Markets

SN - 1386-4181

IS - 2

ER -