The value of the specialist: Empirical evidence from the CBOE

Amber Anand, Daniel G. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the "natural experiment" of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-118
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Financial Markets
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bid-ask spreads
  • Competition
  • Market makers
  • Options
  • Specialists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The value of the specialist: Empirical evidence from the CBOE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this