The Unification of Law and the Postcolonial State: The Limits of State Monism in India and Indonesia

Mirjam Künkler, Yuksel Sezgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article analyzes the evolution of state law pluralism in the field of personal status law in India and Indonesia in the postcolonial era. Having inherited pluri-legal personal law systems from their colonial patrons, postindependence leaders in both countries vowed to eliminate and replace pluri-legal arrangements by uniform civil law systems that would not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, custom, or religion. Despite their attempts at legal unification from the 1940s to 1960s, however, both nations today exhibit high degrees of state law pluralism in personal law. We show that plans for legal unification were abandoned in both countries in the 1970s, and that the turn away from legal unification was mostly driven by concerns of political stability and electoral politics, not, as is often argued in the literature, due to state incapacity or ideological reorientations on part of the ruling elite.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)987-1012
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
Volume60
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

unification of law
Cultural Diversity
Indonesia
India
state law
pluralism
Law
Religion
Politics
civil law
political stability
elite
ethnicity
leader
politics

Keywords

  • India
  • Indonesia
  • legal pluralism
  • legal unification
  • personal law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education

Cite this

The Unification of Law and the Postcolonial State : The Limits of State Monism in India and Indonesia. / Künkler, Mirjam; Sezgin, Yuksel.

In: American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 60, No. 8, 2015, p. 987-1012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8e68ae4d75f4861ac716e618c895115,
title = "The Unification of Law and the Postcolonial State: The Limits of State Monism in India and Indonesia",
abstract = "The article analyzes the evolution of state law pluralism in the field of personal status law in India and Indonesia in the postcolonial era. Having inherited pluri-legal personal law systems from their colonial patrons, postindependence leaders in both countries vowed to eliminate and replace pluri-legal arrangements by uniform civil law systems that would not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, custom, or religion. Despite their attempts at legal unification from the 1940s to 1960s, however, both nations today exhibit high degrees of state law pluralism in personal law. We show that plans for legal unification were abandoned in both countries in the 1970s, and that the turn away from legal unification was mostly driven by concerns of political stability and electoral politics, not, as is often argued in the literature, due to state incapacity or ideological reorientations on part of the ruling elite.",
keywords = "India, Indonesia, legal pluralism, legal unification, personal law",
author = "Mirjam K{\"u}nkler and Yuksel Sezgin",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0002764216643808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "987--1012",
journal = "American Behavioral Scientist",
issn = "0002-7642",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Unification of Law and the Postcolonial State

T2 - The Limits of State Monism in India and Indonesia

AU - Künkler, Mirjam

AU - Sezgin, Yuksel

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The article analyzes the evolution of state law pluralism in the field of personal status law in India and Indonesia in the postcolonial era. Having inherited pluri-legal personal law systems from their colonial patrons, postindependence leaders in both countries vowed to eliminate and replace pluri-legal arrangements by uniform civil law systems that would not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, custom, or religion. Despite their attempts at legal unification from the 1940s to 1960s, however, both nations today exhibit high degrees of state law pluralism in personal law. We show that plans for legal unification were abandoned in both countries in the 1970s, and that the turn away from legal unification was mostly driven by concerns of political stability and electoral politics, not, as is often argued in the literature, due to state incapacity or ideological reorientations on part of the ruling elite.

AB - The article analyzes the evolution of state law pluralism in the field of personal status law in India and Indonesia in the postcolonial era. Having inherited pluri-legal personal law systems from their colonial patrons, postindependence leaders in both countries vowed to eliminate and replace pluri-legal arrangements by uniform civil law systems that would not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, custom, or religion. Despite their attempts at legal unification from the 1940s to 1960s, however, both nations today exhibit high degrees of state law pluralism in personal law. We show that plans for legal unification were abandoned in both countries in the 1970s, and that the turn away from legal unification was mostly driven by concerns of political stability and electoral politics, not, as is often argued in the literature, due to state incapacity or ideological reorientations on part of the ruling elite.

KW - India

KW - Indonesia

KW - legal pluralism

KW - legal unification

KW - personal law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971408033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971408033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0002764216643808

DO - 10.1177/0002764216643808

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971408033

VL - 60

SP - 987

EP - 1012

JO - American Behavioral Scientist

JF - American Behavioral Scientist

SN - 0002-7642

IS - 8

ER -