TY - JOUR
T1 - The timeline of threat processing in repressors
T2 - More evidence for early vigilance and late avoidance
AU - Caldwell, Tracy L.
AU - Newman, Leonard S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by NIMH grant MH58876 to Leonard Newman. We thank Tiffany Daddino, Thomas Griffin, Yosri Hassan, Liz Morrissery, Carrie Mysliwiec, Ayala Ofek, Alexandra Petrohilos, Carol Reinheimer, and Monica Robins for their help in conducting the experiments.
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - Evidence is mixed concerning whether individuals with a repressive coping style can actually selectively avoid threatening stimuli. Recent research (Calvo & Eysenck, 2000) on repressors' threat processing suggests that it is necessary to take into account the timeline of this bias. A spontaneous trait inference paradigm was used here to test the hypothesis that repressors would, relative to others, be less likely to infer unfavorable and threatening traits. However, if pressured to make trait inferences quickly, it was predicted that they would be less likely than others to infer favorable and unthreatening traits. Repressors and nonrepressors were presented with passages that could have supported positive or negative trait inferences. In Study 1, they were asked to respond to trait words as quickly as possible but were not held accountable for doing so. In Study 2, time pressure was increased to capture uncorrected trait inferences. Results indicated that repressors were more likely to make positive trait inferences than others when simply asked to respond quickly. Under time pressure, this bias disappeared. Results point to the importance of taking into account an important moderator between coping style and threat, namely, the stage of processing at which differences in threat processing are being assessed.
AB - Evidence is mixed concerning whether individuals with a repressive coping style can actually selectively avoid threatening stimuli. Recent research (Calvo & Eysenck, 2000) on repressors' threat processing suggests that it is necessary to take into account the timeline of this bias. A spontaneous trait inference paradigm was used here to test the hypothesis that repressors would, relative to others, be less likely to infer unfavorable and threatening traits. However, if pressured to make trait inferences quickly, it was predicted that they would be less likely than others to infer favorable and unthreatening traits. Repressors and nonrepressors were presented with passages that could have supported positive or negative trait inferences. In Study 1, they were asked to respond to trait words as quickly as possible but were not held accountable for doing so. In Study 2, time pressure was increased to capture uncorrected trait inferences. Results indicated that repressors were more likely to make positive trait inferences than others when simply asked to respond quickly. Under time pressure, this bias disappeared. Results point to the importance of taking into account an important moderator between coping style and threat, namely, the stage of processing at which differences in threat processing are being assessed.
KW - Attention
KW - Coping
KW - Inference
KW - Psychological defense
KW - Repressors
KW - Threat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17344371600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17344371600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.004
DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:17344371600
SN - 0191-8869
VL - 38
SP - 1957
EP - 1967
JO - Personality and Individual Differences
JF - Personality and Individual Differences
IS - 8
ER -