Accurate descriptions of the clinical judgment literature are important as a basis for planning the next generation of clinical judgment research. In this paper, we clarify our position with respect to these issues and offer an additional discussion of how our tetrahedral framework may be useful for designing future studies of clinical judgment.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||6|
|Journal||Clinical Psychology Review|
|State||Published - 1988|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health