The struggle for web equality by persons with cognitive disabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is based on the book eQuality: The Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities (2014, Cambridge University Press). It contends that the rights of individuals with cognitive disabilities to equal access to web content are not only protected under law, but may also be implemented and supported by current user-based, semantic and cloud technologies. Consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, web content equality is defined through functional, rather than disability-specific, approaches and techniques to enable personalization and customized usage across online functions. Legal challenges brought forward by individuals with cognitive and other disabilities illustrate the barriers still faced by individuals with disabilities to web equality as well as some of the solutions to and outcomes of these challenges. In closing, a view for the full and equal enjoyment of web content, which considers technology, financial benefits, and the role of advocacy and regulations, is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-32
Number of pages29
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Disabled Persons
equality
disability
Technology
human being
United Nations
Semantics
UN Convention
personalization
act
semantics
regulation
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The struggle for web equality by persons with cognitive disabilities. / Blanck, Peter.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 4-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{00cbf3282a8a470887bbf03617fb2d87,
title = "The struggle for web equality by persons with cognitive disabilities",
abstract = "This article is based on the book eQuality: The Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities (2014, Cambridge University Press). It contends that the rights of individuals with cognitive disabilities to equal access to web content are not only protected under law, but may also be implemented and supported by current user-based, semantic and cloud technologies. Consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, web content equality is defined through functional, rather than disability-specific, approaches and techniques to enable personalization and customized usage across online functions. Legal challenges brought forward by individuals with cognitive and other disabilities illustrate the barriers still faced by individuals with disabilities to web equality as well as some of the solutions to and outcomes of these challenges. In closing, a view for the full and equal enjoyment of web content, which considers technology, financial benefits, and the role of advocacy and regulations, is discussed.",
author = "Peter Blanck",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.2101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "4--32",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The struggle for web equality by persons with cognitive disabilities

AU - Blanck, Peter

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This article is based on the book eQuality: The Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities (2014, Cambridge University Press). It contends that the rights of individuals with cognitive disabilities to equal access to web content are not only protected under law, but may also be implemented and supported by current user-based, semantic and cloud technologies. Consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, web content equality is defined through functional, rather than disability-specific, approaches and techniques to enable personalization and customized usage across online functions. Legal challenges brought forward by individuals with cognitive and other disabilities illustrate the barriers still faced by individuals with disabilities to web equality as well as some of the solutions to and outcomes of these challenges. In closing, a view for the full and equal enjoyment of web content, which considers technology, financial benefits, and the role of advocacy and regulations, is discussed.

AB - This article is based on the book eQuality: The Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities (2014, Cambridge University Press). It contends that the rights of individuals with cognitive disabilities to equal access to web content are not only protected under law, but may also be implemented and supported by current user-based, semantic and cloud technologies. Consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, web content equality is defined through functional, rather than disability-specific, approaches and techniques to enable personalization and customized usage across online functions. Legal challenges brought forward by individuals with cognitive and other disabilities illustrate the barriers still faced by individuals with disabilities to web equality as well as some of the solutions to and outcomes of these challenges. In closing, a view for the full and equal enjoyment of web content, which considers technology, financial benefits, and the role of advocacy and regulations, is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897607198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897607198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2101

DO - 10.1002/bsl.2101

M3 - Article

C2 - 24510884

AN - SCOPUS:84897607198

VL - 32

SP - 4

EP - 32

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 1

ER -