TY - JOUR
T1 - The Proximity Operator of the Log-Sum Penalty
AU - Prater-Bennette, Ashley
AU - Shen, Lixin
AU - Tripp, Erin E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded in part by Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) grant 21RICOR035. The work of L. Shen was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant DMS-1913039, 2020 U.S. Air Force Summer Faculty Fellowship Program, and the 2020 Air Force Visiting Faculty Research Program funded through AFOSR grant 18RICOR029. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory. Cleared for public release 08 Jan 2021: Case number AFRL-2021-0024.
Funding Information:
This work was funded in part by Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) grant 21RICOR035. The work of L. Shen was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant DMS-1913039, 2020 U.S. Air Force Summer Faculty Fellowship Program, and the 2020 Air Force Visiting Faculty Research Program funded through AFOSR grant 18RICOR029. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory. Cleared for public release 08 Jan 2021: Case number AFRL-2021-0024.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - The log-sum penalty is often adopted as a replacement for the ℓ pseudo-norm in compressive sensing and low-rank optimization. The proximity operator of the ℓ penalty, i.e., the hard-thresholding operator, plays an essential role in applications; similarly, we require an efficient method for evaluating the proximity operator of the log-sum penalty. Due to the nonconvexity of this function, its proximity operator is commonly computed through the iteratively reweighted ℓ1 method, which replaces the log-sum term with its first-order approximation. This paper reports that the proximity operator of the log-sum penalty actually has an explicit expression. With it, we show that the iteratively reweighted ℓ1 solution disagrees with the true proximity operator in certain regions. As a by-product, the iteratively reweighted ℓ1 solution is precisely characterized in terms of the chosen initialization. We also give the explicit form of the proximity operator for the composition of the log-sum penalty with the singular value function, as seen in low-rank applications. These results should be useful in the development of efficient and accurate algorithms for optimization problems involving the log-sum penalty. We present applications to solving compressive sensing problems and to mixed additive Gaussian white noise and impulse noise removal.
AB - The log-sum penalty is often adopted as a replacement for the ℓ pseudo-norm in compressive sensing and low-rank optimization. The proximity operator of the ℓ penalty, i.e., the hard-thresholding operator, plays an essential role in applications; similarly, we require an efficient method for evaluating the proximity operator of the log-sum penalty. Due to the nonconvexity of this function, its proximity operator is commonly computed through the iteratively reweighted ℓ1 method, which replaces the log-sum term with its first-order approximation. This paper reports that the proximity operator of the log-sum penalty actually has an explicit expression. With it, we show that the iteratively reweighted ℓ1 solution disagrees with the true proximity operator in certain regions. As a by-product, the iteratively reweighted ℓ1 solution is precisely characterized in terms of the chosen initialization. We also give the explicit form of the proximity operator for the composition of the log-sum penalty with the singular value function, as seen in low-rank applications. These results should be useful in the development of efficient and accurate algorithms for optimization problems involving the log-sum penalty. We present applications to solving compressive sensing problems and to mixed additive Gaussian white noise and impulse noise removal.
KW - Compressive sensing
KW - Iteratively reweighted ℓ
KW - Log-sum function
KW - Low-rank regularization
KW - Proximal mapping
KW - Proximity operator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140604435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140604435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10915-022-02021-4
DO - 10.1007/s10915-022-02021-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140604435
SN - 0885-7474
VL - 93
JO - Journal of Scientific Computing
JF - Journal of Scientific Computing
IS - 3
M1 - 67
ER -