The Privatization Decision: Do Public Managers Make a Difference?

David M. Van Slyke, Charles A. Hammonds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, the political environment of privatization and its impact on public management are examined in the context of the privatization of a state park in Georgia. The study specifically focuses on the actions of public managers in the privatization formulation and implementation stage. Public management capacity actually increased as a result of privatization. This is an outcome quite different from those reported by public management studies of other privatized services. Applying a principal-agent framework, this study yielded several lessons that may strengthen public managers' capacity to act as "smart buyers" of goods and services and to enforce accountability when managing contractual relationships. This study links theory to practice using a case study that allows a careful examination of the strategic responses of public managers confronted by largely political, as opposed to economic, pressures to privatize an already successful state park.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-163
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Agency theory
  • Policy implementation
  • Privatization
  • Public management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Privatization Decision: Do Public Managers Make a Difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this