The influence of data selection and type of analysis on interpretations of temporal stability in Oligocene Faunas of Mississippi

Christy C. Visaggi, Linda C Ivany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fossiliferous shallowing-upward parasequences in the early Oligocene Byram Formation of Mississippi provide an ideal opportunity to explore the effects of differences in data preparation, format, and analysis in testing for faunal persistence. Ten replicate bulk samples collected from each of three lithologically similar horizons in successive parasequences yielded >13,000 molluscan individuals. Assemblages were first compared using more traditional descriptive statistics that examined aspects of taxonomy, abundance, and guild structure, and were then compared using multivariate techniques with similarity coefficients that employed both compositional and abundance data. Different procedures for identifying and excluding rare taxa prior to analysis were also investigated. Simple numerical methods emphasized similarities among assemblages; hierarchical clustering, nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS), and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) revealed differences among the faunal horizons. Multivariate tests indicated stasis only when using presence-absence data with a large number of rare taxa excluded. When abundance data are utilized, however, faunal change through time is suggested, regardless of how rare taxa are treated. The choice of data format, rare taxon exclusion policy, and analytical approach all affect the interpretation of results and the outcome of hypothesis tests for stability, suggesting that differences in methodology partly contribute to disagreement among studies examining faunal persistence. Furthermore, various properties related to ecosystem structure are ascribed different degrees of importance depending on the study. Thus, comparisons of patterns should be made on equal footing to ensure that differences in methodology are not contributing to differences in interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-779
Number of pages11
JournalPalaios
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Oligocene
fauna
parasequence
persistence
guild structure
testing
methodology
ecosystem structure
footing
statistics
numerical method
taxonomy
analysis
ecosystems
sampling
test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Palaeontology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

The influence of data selection and type of analysis on interpretations of temporal stability in Oligocene Faunas of Mississippi. / Visaggi, Christy C.; Ivany, Linda C.

In: Palaios, Vol. 25, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 769-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0d8dca7dcd84a6f98fd118a76d47678,
title = "The influence of data selection and type of analysis on interpretations of temporal stability in Oligocene Faunas of Mississippi",
abstract = "Fossiliferous shallowing-upward parasequences in the early Oligocene Byram Formation of Mississippi provide an ideal opportunity to explore the effects of differences in data preparation, format, and analysis in testing for faunal persistence. Ten replicate bulk samples collected from each of three lithologically similar horizons in successive parasequences yielded >13,000 molluscan individuals. Assemblages were first compared using more traditional descriptive statistics that examined aspects of taxonomy, abundance, and guild structure, and were then compared using multivariate techniques with similarity coefficients that employed both compositional and abundance data. Different procedures for identifying and excluding rare taxa prior to analysis were also investigated. Simple numerical methods emphasized similarities among assemblages; hierarchical clustering, nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS), and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) revealed differences among the faunal horizons. Multivariate tests indicated stasis only when using presence-absence data with a large number of rare taxa excluded. When abundance data are utilized, however, faunal change through time is suggested, regardless of how rare taxa are treated. The choice of data format, rare taxon exclusion policy, and analytical approach all affect the interpretation of results and the outcome of hypothesis tests for stability, suggesting that differences in methodology partly contribute to disagreement among studies examining faunal persistence. Furthermore, various properties related to ecosystem structure are ascribed different degrees of importance depending on the study. Thus, comparisons of patterns should be made on equal footing to ensure that differences in methodology are not contributing to differences in interpretation.",
author = "Visaggi, {Christy C.} and Ivany, {Linda C}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.2110/palo.2010.p10-002r",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "769--779",
journal = "Palaios",
issn = "0883-1351",
publisher = "SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of data selection and type of analysis on interpretations of temporal stability in Oligocene Faunas of Mississippi

AU - Visaggi, Christy C.

AU - Ivany, Linda C

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Fossiliferous shallowing-upward parasequences in the early Oligocene Byram Formation of Mississippi provide an ideal opportunity to explore the effects of differences in data preparation, format, and analysis in testing for faunal persistence. Ten replicate bulk samples collected from each of three lithologically similar horizons in successive parasequences yielded >13,000 molluscan individuals. Assemblages were first compared using more traditional descriptive statistics that examined aspects of taxonomy, abundance, and guild structure, and were then compared using multivariate techniques with similarity coefficients that employed both compositional and abundance data. Different procedures for identifying and excluding rare taxa prior to analysis were also investigated. Simple numerical methods emphasized similarities among assemblages; hierarchical clustering, nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS), and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) revealed differences among the faunal horizons. Multivariate tests indicated stasis only when using presence-absence data with a large number of rare taxa excluded. When abundance data are utilized, however, faunal change through time is suggested, regardless of how rare taxa are treated. The choice of data format, rare taxon exclusion policy, and analytical approach all affect the interpretation of results and the outcome of hypothesis tests for stability, suggesting that differences in methodology partly contribute to disagreement among studies examining faunal persistence. Furthermore, various properties related to ecosystem structure are ascribed different degrees of importance depending on the study. Thus, comparisons of patterns should be made on equal footing to ensure that differences in methodology are not contributing to differences in interpretation.

AB - Fossiliferous shallowing-upward parasequences in the early Oligocene Byram Formation of Mississippi provide an ideal opportunity to explore the effects of differences in data preparation, format, and analysis in testing for faunal persistence. Ten replicate bulk samples collected from each of three lithologically similar horizons in successive parasequences yielded >13,000 molluscan individuals. Assemblages were first compared using more traditional descriptive statistics that examined aspects of taxonomy, abundance, and guild structure, and were then compared using multivariate techniques with similarity coefficients that employed both compositional and abundance data. Different procedures for identifying and excluding rare taxa prior to analysis were also investigated. Simple numerical methods emphasized similarities among assemblages; hierarchical clustering, nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS), and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) revealed differences among the faunal horizons. Multivariate tests indicated stasis only when using presence-absence data with a large number of rare taxa excluded. When abundance data are utilized, however, faunal change through time is suggested, regardless of how rare taxa are treated. The choice of data format, rare taxon exclusion policy, and analytical approach all affect the interpretation of results and the outcome of hypothesis tests for stability, suggesting that differences in methodology partly contribute to disagreement among studies examining faunal persistence. Furthermore, various properties related to ecosystem structure are ascribed different degrees of importance depending on the study. Thus, comparisons of patterns should be made on equal footing to ensure that differences in methodology are not contributing to differences in interpretation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649743941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649743941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2110/palo.2010.p10-002r

DO - 10.2110/palo.2010.p10-002r

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78649743941

VL - 25

SP - 769

EP - 779

JO - Palaios

JF - Palaios

SN - 0883-1351

IS - 12

ER -