The Future of Public Participation

Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems

Tina Nabatchi, Emma Ertinger, Matt Leighninger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S35-S44
JournalConflict Resolution Quarterly
Volume33
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

participation
Law
Negotiating
conflict resolution
Community Participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The Future of Public Participation : Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems. / Nabatchi, Tina; Ertinger, Emma; Leighninger, Matt.

In: Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Vol. 33, 01.12.2015, p. S35-S44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3b57ec02d7644dba7018c068fcbd84a,
title = "The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems",
abstract = "In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems.",
author = "Tina Nabatchi and Emma Ertinger and Matt Leighninger",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/crq.21142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "S35--S44",
journal = "Conflict Resolution Quarterly",
issn = "1536-5581",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Future of Public Participation

T2 - Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

AU - Ertinger, Emma

AU - Leighninger, Matt

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems.

AB - In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955214513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955214513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/crq.21142

DO - 10.1002/crq.21142

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - S35-S44

JO - Conflict Resolution Quarterly

JF - Conflict Resolution Quarterly

SN - 1536-5581

ER -