TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of captivity on the mammalian gut microbiome
AU - McKenzie, Valerie J.
AU - Song, Se Jin
AU - Delsuc, Frédéric
AU - Prest, Tiffany L.
AU - Oliverio, Angela M.
AU - Korpita, Timothy M.
AU - Alexiev, Alexandra
AU - Amato, Katherine R.
AU - Metcalf, Jessica L.
AU - Kowalewski, Martin
AU - Avenant, Nico L.
AU - Link, Andres
AU - Di Fiore, Anthony
AU - Seguin-Orlando, Andaine
AU - Feh, Claudia
AU - Orlando, Ludovic
AU - Mendelson, Joseph R.
AU - Sanders, Jon
AU - Knight, Rob
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by a grant from the John S. Templeton Foundation [to V.J.M. and R.K.], the W.M. Keck Foundation [to V.J.M., R.K., and many other co-PIs], and a European Research Council consolidator grant [contribution ISEM 2017-118-S of the Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, ERC Converge Ant #683257 to F.D.]. Participation in the symposium was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation [IOS-1638630].
Funding Information:
Esser (Sauverie du Mont Faron, Toulon Zoo, France), Elodie Trunet and Benjamin Lamglait (Sigean African Reserve, France), Angela Ryan and Amanda Ferguson (Regent’s Park, Zoological Society of London, UK), Sarah Forsyth (Colchester Zoo, UK), Terri Roth (Cincinnati Zoo, USA), Kenton Kerns, Sara Hallager (National Zoo, USA), Elias Bader (Zurich Zoo, Switzerland). We would like to acknowledge the following people for their work collecting fecal samples from wild primates: Andrea Baden (Hunter College); Gillian Britton; Frank Cuozzo (University of North Dakota); Nathaniel Dominy (Dartmouth College); Tony Goldberg (University of Wisconsin Madison); Andres Gomez (J. Craig Venter Institute); Klara Petr≤zelková (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic); Michelle Sauther (University of Colorado Boulder); Stacey Tecot (University of Arizona). Funding for the collection and sequencing of non-human primate samples was provided by both the Templeton Foundation and an NSF HOMINID grant (#0935347 to PIs Steve Leigh and Rebecca Stumpf).
Funding Information:
This project was supported by a grant from the John S. Templeton Foundation [to V.J.M. and R.K.], the W.M. Keck Foundation [to V.J.M., R.K., and many other co-PIs], and a European Research Council consolidator grant [contribution ISEM 2017-118-S of the Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, ERC Converge Ant #683257 to F.D.]. Participation in the symposium was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation [IOS-1638630].
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Recent studies increasingly note the effect of captivity or the built environment on the microbiome of humans and other animals. As symbiotic microbes are essential to many aspects of biology (e.g., digestive and immune functions), it is important to understand how lifestyle differences can impact the microbiome, and, consequently, the health of hosts. Animals living in captivity experience a range of changes that may influence the gut bacteria, such as diet changes, treatments, and reduced contact with other individuals, species and variable environmental substrates that act as sources of bacterial diversity. Thus far, initial results from previous studies point to a pattern of decreased bacterial diversity in captive animals. However, these studies are relatively limited in the scope of species that have been examined. Here we present a dataset that includes paired wild and captive samples from mammalian taxa across six Orders to investigate generalizable patterns of the effects captivity on mammalian gut bacteria. In comparing the wild to the captive condition, our results indicate that alpha diversity of the gut bacteria remains consistent in some mammalian hosts (bovids, giraffes, anteaters, and aardvarks), declines in the captive condition in some hosts (canids, primates, and equids), and increases in the captive condition in one host taxon (rhinoceros). Differences in gut bacterial beta diversity between the captive and wild state were observed for most of the taxa surveyed, except the even-toed ungulates (bovids and giraffes). Additionally, beta diversity variation was also strongly influenced by host taxonomic group, diet type, and gut fermentation physiology. Bacterial taxa that demonstrated larger shifts in relative abundance between the captive and wild states included members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Overall, the patterns that we observe will inform a range of disciplines from veterinary practice to captive breeding efforts for biological conservation. Furthermore, bacterial taxa that persist in the captive state provide unique insight into symbiotic relationships with the host.
AB - Recent studies increasingly note the effect of captivity or the built environment on the microbiome of humans and other animals. As symbiotic microbes are essential to many aspects of biology (e.g., digestive and immune functions), it is important to understand how lifestyle differences can impact the microbiome, and, consequently, the health of hosts. Animals living in captivity experience a range of changes that may influence the gut bacteria, such as diet changes, treatments, and reduced contact with other individuals, species and variable environmental substrates that act as sources of bacterial diversity. Thus far, initial results from previous studies point to a pattern of decreased bacterial diversity in captive animals. However, these studies are relatively limited in the scope of species that have been examined. Here we present a dataset that includes paired wild and captive samples from mammalian taxa across six Orders to investigate generalizable patterns of the effects captivity on mammalian gut bacteria. In comparing the wild to the captive condition, our results indicate that alpha diversity of the gut bacteria remains consistent in some mammalian hosts (bovids, giraffes, anteaters, and aardvarks), declines in the captive condition in some hosts (canids, primates, and equids), and increases in the captive condition in one host taxon (rhinoceros). Differences in gut bacterial beta diversity between the captive and wild state were observed for most of the taxa surveyed, except the even-toed ungulates (bovids and giraffes). Additionally, beta diversity variation was also strongly influenced by host taxonomic group, diet type, and gut fermentation physiology. Bacterial taxa that demonstrated larger shifts in relative abundance between the captive and wild states included members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Overall, the patterns that we observe will inform a range of disciplines from veterinary practice to captive breeding efforts for biological conservation. Furthermore, bacterial taxa that persist in the captive state provide unique insight into symbiotic relationships with the host.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034108365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034108365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/icb/icx090
DO - 10.1093/icb/icx090
M3 - Article
C2 - 28985326
AN - SCOPUS:85034108365
SN - 1540-7063
VL - 57
SP - 690
EP - 704
JO - Integrative and Comparative Biology
JF - Integrative and Comparative Biology
IS - 4
ER -