TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of feedback delay on perceptual category learning and item memory
T2 - Further limits of multiple systems
AU - Stephens, Rachel G.
AU - Kalish, Michael L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by NSF award 1461365 to Michael L. Kalish. The authors thank Eric Moskowitz, Osung Seo, and Ndeye Kane Diaw for their assistance with data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Delayed feedback during categorization training has been hypothesized to differentially affect 2 systems that underlie learning for rule-based (RB) or information-integration (II) structures. We tested an alternative possibility: that II learning requires more precise item representations than RB learning, and so is harmed more by a delay interval filled with a confusable mask. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of feedback delay on memory for RB and II exemplars, both without and with concurrent categorization training. Without the training, II items were indeed more difficult to recognize than RB items, but there was no detectable effect of delay on item memory. In contrast, with concurrent categorization training, there were effects of both category structure and delayed feedback on item memory, which were related to corresponding changes in category learning. However, we did not observe the critical selective impact of delay on II classification performance that has been shown previously. Our own results were also confirmed in a follow-up study (Experiment 3) involving only categorization training. The selective influence of feedback delay on II learning appears to be contingent on the relative size of subgroups of high-performing participants, and in fact does not support that RB and II category learning are qualitatively different. We conclude that a key part of successfully solving perceptual categorization problems is developing more precise item representations, which can be impaired by delayed feedback during training. More important, the evidence for multiple systems of category learning is even weaker than previously proposed.
AB - Delayed feedback during categorization training has been hypothesized to differentially affect 2 systems that underlie learning for rule-based (RB) or information-integration (II) structures. We tested an alternative possibility: that II learning requires more precise item representations than RB learning, and so is harmed more by a delay interval filled with a confusable mask. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of feedback delay on memory for RB and II exemplars, both without and with concurrent categorization training. Without the training, II items were indeed more difficult to recognize than RB items, but there was no detectable effect of delay on item memory. In contrast, with concurrent categorization training, there were effects of both category structure and delayed feedback on item memory, which were related to corresponding changes in category learning. However, we did not observe the critical selective impact of delay on II classification performance that has been shown previously. Our own results were also confirmed in a follow-up study (Experiment 3) involving only categorization training. The selective influence of feedback delay on II learning appears to be contingent on the relative size of subgroups of high-performing participants, and in fact does not support that RB and II category learning are qualitatively different. We conclude that a key part of successfully solving perceptual categorization problems is developing more precise item representations, which can be impaired by delayed feedback during training. More important, the evidence for multiple systems of category learning is even weaker than previously proposed.
KW - Categorization
KW - Category learning
KW - Delayed matching to sample
KW - Multiple learning systems
KW - State-trace analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041175007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041175007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000528
DO - 10.1037/xlm0000528
M3 - Article
C2 - 29389182
AN - SCOPUS:85041175007
SN - 0278-7393
VL - 44
SP - 1397
EP - 1413
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
IS - 9
ER -