TY - JOUR
T1 - The ebbs and flows of attachment
T2 - Within-person variation in attachment undermine secure individuals' relationship wellbeing across time
AU - Girme, Yuthika U.
AU - Agnew, Christopher R.
AU - VanderDrift, Laura E.
AU - Harvey, S. Marie
AU - Rholes, W. Steven
AU - Simpson, Jeffry A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Benjamin W. Hadden for assistance with Study 1 data collection. Study 2 was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award R01HD47151 to S. Marie Harvey (PI). Study 3 was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award MH49599 to Jeffry A. Simpson and W. Steven Rholes. The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Psychological Association 0022-3514/18/$12.00.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Although attachment security is relatively stable over time, individuals do experience significant within-person variation in their attachment security across time. No research to date, however, has assessed the relational consequences of within-person variation (fluctuations) in attachment security toward a specific attachment figure. Study 1 (N = 409) first examined whether attachment security was associated with individuals' expectations that their current intimate relationship would be stable and consistent over time (vs. inconsistent and unstable). Studies 2 and 3 extended this by examining the prevalence and consequences of actual within-person variation (fluctuations) in relationship-specific attachment security toward an intimate partner in 2 multiwave longitudinal studies that assessed individuals (Study 2, N = 324) and couples (Study 3, N = 171 dyads). The results indicate that secure individuals (those low in attachment anxiety or attachment avoidance) expect their current relationship to remain relatively stable and consistent over time (Study 1). However, Studies 2 and 3 demonstrated that most individuals do experience fluctuations in their relationship-specific attachment security. Moreover, greater fluctuations predict declines in relationship satisfaction (Studies 2 and 3) and increases in relationship distress (Study 3) over time, but primarily for secure individuals (those low in baseline attachment anxiety or attachment avoidance). This set of findings highlight the importance of examining within-person fluctuations in attachment security, which are associated with declines in trajectories of relationship wellbeing, particularly for secure individuals who anticipate greater stability in their relationships.
AB - Although attachment security is relatively stable over time, individuals do experience significant within-person variation in their attachment security across time. No research to date, however, has assessed the relational consequences of within-person variation (fluctuations) in attachment security toward a specific attachment figure. Study 1 (N = 409) first examined whether attachment security was associated with individuals' expectations that their current intimate relationship would be stable and consistent over time (vs. inconsistent and unstable). Studies 2 and 3 extended this by examining the prevalence and consequences of actual within-person variation (fluctuations) in relationship-specific attachment security toward an intimate partner in 2 multiwave longitudinal studies that assessed individuals (Study 2, N = 324) and couples (Study 3, N = 171 dyads). The results indicate that secure individuals (those low in attachment anxiety or attachment avoidance) expect their current relationship to remain relatively stable and consistent over time (Study 1). However, Studies 2 and 3 demonstrated that most individuals do experience fluctuations in their relationship-specific attachment security. Moreover, greater fluctuations predict declines in relationship satisfaction (Studies 2 and 3) and increases in relationship distress (Study 3) over time, but primarily for secure individuals (those low in baseline attachment anxiety or attachment avoidance). This set of findings highlight the importance of examining within-person fluctuations in attachment security, which are associated with declines in trajectories of relationship wellbeing, particularly for secure individuals who anticipate greater stability in their relationships.
KW - Attachment insecurity
KW - Intimate relationships
KW - Within-person fluctuations
KW - Within-person variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035215121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035215121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/pspi0000115
DO - 10.1037/pspi0000115
M3 - Article
C2 - 29189026
AN - SCOPUS:85035215121
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 114
SP - 397
EP - 421
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 3
ER -