Abstract
Gondolf has criticized our review as being selective and suggests that the Duluth model is more promising than we had concluded. We note that his own outcome study showed a failure rate for a Duluth program of 40% - identical to the mean rate of the studies we reviewed. We see his critiques as representative of the very mindset we described in our original paper - that of the gender paradigm. We review some of the shortcomings of Gondolf's critique as representative of this mindset. Our conclusion about the failure of the Duluth program remains unchanged.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 658-667 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Aggression and Violent Behavior |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- Duluth model
- Failed strategy
- Intimate partner violence
- Psychoeducational
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health