The Democratic Divide in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By analyzing Pew Internet and American Life Project's postelection survey, this article examines whether there continues to exist a democratic digital divide in the 2008 U.S. presidential election season. The research focuses on the divide patterns of four different types of political Internet use: information-seeking, communication, mobilization, and use of social networking sites. The research results suggest a higher likelihood for the socioeconomically advantaged to do online political activities. A generational gap is less apparent with regard to communication than information-seeking and mobilization. The sociodemographic pattern of the democratic divide overall resembles that of Internet access divide, but the political divide manifested by education and income is being bridged to some extent among current users of social networking sites. Although younger generations were more likely to use social networking sites for political activities, such use did not significantly raise the probability to cast a ballot in the 2008 presidential election.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-149
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Information Technology and Politics
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

presidential election
networking
political activity
Internet
mobilization
communication
Information use
digital divide
Communication
research focus
research results
Education
income
education

Keywords

  • Democratic divide
  • digital divide
  • e-democracy
  • online political participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Public Administration
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Democratic Divide in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. / Nam, Taewoo; Stromer-Galley, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Information Technology and Politics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 133-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45e420f0b8b54b2a965cd6621b78646b,
title = "The Democratic Divide in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election",
abstract = "By analyzing Pew Internet and American Life Project's postelection survey, this article examines whether there continues to exist a democratic digital divide in the 2008 U.S. presidential election season. The research focuses on the divide patterns of four different types of political Internet use: information-seeking, communication, mobilization, and use of social networking sites. The research results suggest a higher likelihood for the socioeconomically advantaged to do online political activities. A generational gap is less apparent with regard to communication than information-seeking and mobilization. The sociodemographic pattern of the democratic divide overall resembles that of Internet access divide, but the political divide manifested by education and income is being bridged to some extent among current users of social networking sites. Although younger generations were more likely to use social networking sites for political activities, such use did not significantly raise the probability to cast a ballot in the 2008 presidential election.",
keywords = "Democratic divide, digital divide, e-democracy, online political participation",
author = "Taewoo Nam and Jennifer Stromer-Galley",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/19331681.2011.579858",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "133--149",
journal = "Journal of Information Technology and Politics",
issn = "1933-1681",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Democratic Divide in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election

AU - Nam, Taewoo

AU - Stromer-Galley, Jennifer

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - By analyzing Pew Internet and American Life Project's postelection survey, this article examines whether there continues to exist a democratic digital divide in the 2008 U.S. presidential election season. The research focuses on the divide patterns of four different types of political Internet use: information-seeking, communication, mobilization, and use of social networking sites. The research results suggest a higher likelihood for the socioeconomically advantaged to do online political activities. A generational gap is less apparent with regard to communication than information-seeking and mobilization. The sociodemographic pattern of the democratic divide overall resembles that of Internet access divide, but the political divide manifested by education and income is being bridged to some extent among current users of social networking sites. Although younger generations were more likely to use social networking sites for political activities, such use did not significantly raise the probability to cast a ballot in the 2008 presidential election.

AB - By analyzing Pew Internet and American Life Project's postelection survey, this article examines whether there continues to exist a democratic digital divide in the 2008 U.S. presidential election season. The research focuses on the divide patterns of four different types of political Internet use: information-seeking, communication, mobilization, and use of social networking sites. The research results suggest a higher likelihood for the socioeconomically advantaged to do online political activities. A generational gap is less apparent with regard to communication than information-seeking and mobilization. The sociodemographic pattern of the democratic divide overall resembles that of Internet access divide, but the political divide manifested by education and income is being bridged to some extent among current users of social networking sites. Although younger generations were more likely to use social networking sites for political activities, such use did not significantly raise the probability to cast a ballot in the 2008 presidential election.

KW - Democratic divide

KW - digital divide

KW - e-democracy

KW - online political participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859706604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859706604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19331681.2011.579858

DO - 10.1080/19331681.2011.579858

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 133

EP - 149

JO - Journal of Information Technology and Politics

JF - Journal of Information Technology and Politics

SN - 1933-1681

IS - 2

ER -