Abstract
When items on one list receive more encoding than items on another list, the improvement in performance usually manifests as an increase in the hit rate and a decrease in the false alarm rate (FAR). A common account of this strength based mirror effect is that participants adopt a more strict criterion following a strongly than weakly encoded list (e.g., Cary & Reder, 2003; Stretch & Wixted, 1998). Differentiation models offer an alternative: more encoding leads to a more accurate memory representation for the studied item. A more accurate representation is less confusable with an unrelated item, resulting in a decrease in the FAR (McClelland & Chappell, 1998; Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997). Differentiation models make additional predictions about reversals in FARs for foils similar to a studied item as a function of the composition of the study list. These predictions were empirically tested and confirmed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 461-478 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Memory and Language |
Volume | 55 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Criterion shifts
- Differentiation
- False memory
- Memory models
- Mirror effect
- Recognition memory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Language and Linguistics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Linguistics and Language
- Artificial Intelligence