The agglomeration of American R&D labs

Kristy Buzard, Gerald A. Carlino, Robert M. Hunt, Jake K. Carr, Tony E. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

We employ a unique data set to examine the spatial clustering of about 1700 private R&D labs in California and in the U.S. Northeast Corridor. Using these data, which contain the R&D labs’ complete addresses, we are able to more precisely locate innovative activity than with patent data, which only contain zip codes for inventors’ residential addresses. We avoid the problems of scale and borders associated with using fixed spatial boundaries, such as zip codes, by developing a new point-pattern procedure. Our multiscale core-cluster approach identifies the location and size of significant R&D clusters at various scales, such as a half mile, 1 mile, 5 miles, and more. Our analysis identifies four major clusters in the Northeast Corridor (one each in Boston, New York–Northern New Jersey, Philadelphia–Wilmington, and Washington, D.C.,) and three major clusters in California (one each in the Bay Area, Los Angeles, and San Diego).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-26
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Urban Economics
Volume101
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • Geographic concentration
  • Innovation
  • R&D labs
  • Spatial clustering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The agglomeration of American R&D labs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this