TY - JOUR
T1 - Teachers with LD
T2 - Ongoing negotiations with discourses of disability
AU - Ferri, Beth A.
AU - Connor, David J.
AU - Solis, Santiago
AU - Valle, Jan
AU - Volpitta, Donna
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - The purpose of this study is to examine how 4 teachers with learning disabilities (LD) negotiate multiple, complex, and sometimes contradictory discourses of disabilities in constructing their own understandings of LD. We chose to study teachers with LD because of their unique access to at least 3 different sources of knowledge about LD: (a) professional discourses on disability, (b) mainstream cultural messages about LD, and (c) insights gained from their own life experience. We drew on aspects of critical discourse analysis and narrative inquiry for this investigation. Our findings indicate that participants draw on these discourses and on their teaching experience in various and complex ways to construct meaning about LD. In some instances, participants use the dominant discourses; at other times, they work to subvert these meanings. Yet, paradoxically, whether speaking with or against these meanings, their voices are inescapably engaging with authoritative discourses and cultural scripts surrounding disability.
AB - The purpose of this study is to examine how 4 teachers with learning disabilities (LD) negotiate multiple, complex, and sometimes contradictory discourses of disabilities in constructing their own understandings of LD. We chose to study teachers with LD because of their unique access to at least 3 different sources of knowledge about LD: (a) professional discourses on disability, (b) mainstream cultural messages about LD, and (c) insights gained from their own life experience. We drew on aspects of critical discourse analysis and narrative inquiry for this investigation. Our findings indicate that participants draw on these discourses and on their teaching experience in various and complex ways to construct meaning about LD. In some instances, participants use the dominant discourses; at other times, they work to subvert these meanings. Yet, paradoxically, whether speaking with or against these meanings, their voices are inescapably engaging with authoritative discourses and cultural scripts surrounding disability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12744269940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12744269940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00222194050380010501
DO - 10.1177/00222194050380010501
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15727329
AN - SCOPUS:12744269940
SN - 0022-2194
VL - 38
SP - 62
EP - 78
JO - Journal of learning disabilities
JF - Journal of learning disabilities
IS - 1
ER -