Systematic Representative Design: A Reply to Commentaries

Lynn C. Miller, David C. Jeong, Liyuan Wang, Sonia Jawaid Shaikh, Traci K. Gillig, Carlos G. Godoy, Paul R. Appleby, Charisse L. Corsbie-Massay, Stacy Marsella, John L. Christensen, Stephen J. Read

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Systematic Representative Design (SRD), enabled by today’s technologies leverages many of the strengths of past designs into a new synthesis affording the capacity for both causal inference and generalizability to everyday life (GEL). In doing so, it could help better integrate past and ongoing empirical research findings in psychology. Generally, the commentaries were positive and thought-provoking. Delightfully, they gave us new opportunities to both clarify misunderstandings as well as further address the feasibility of this approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-263
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Inquiry
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2 2019


  • Sampling
  • Systematic Representative Design
  • Virtual Reality
  • Virtual environments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic Representative Design: A Reply to Commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this