Strategic Communication and the Integrative Complexity-Ideology Relationship

Meta-Analytic Findings Reveal Differences Between Public Politicians and Private Citizens in Their Use of Simple Rhetoric

Shannon Houck, Lucian Gideon Conway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on the relationship between political conservatism and integrative complexity has yielded contradictory results, and little effort has been made to place these mixed results in a theoretical context. The present article considers this issue through a strategic model of language that suggests different psychological processes apply to public politicians versus private citizens. We use a methodologically precise meta-analytic test of the relationship between political ideology and integrative complexity to examine the degree that conservative simplicity can be understood as a function of public versus private samples. Across 35 studies, findings revealed that conservatives are significantly less complex than liberals overall; however, while this effect was significant for public politicians, no relationship emerged for private citizens. Consistent with a strategic model, conservative simplicity was particularly in evidence for elected officials. This theoretical analysis has many consequences for our understanding of psychological theories that help explain the consequences of political ideology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPolitical Psychology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Psychological Theory
political ideology
Politics
politician
rhetoric
Language
ideology
Communication
Psychology
citizen
psychological theory
communication
conservatism
Research
language
evidence
Rhetoric
Ideology
Politicians
Political Ideology

Keywords

  • integrative complexity
  • meta-analysis
  • political ideology
  • political rhetoric
  • strategic communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{821e729ff63a4c76aac8504d5aff27e4,
title = "Strategic Communication and the Integrative Complexity-Ideology Relationship: Meta-Analytic Findings Reveal Differences Between Public Politicians and Private Citizens in Their Use of Simple Rhetoric",
abstract = "Research on the relationship between political conservatism and integrative complexity has yielded contradictory results, and little effort has been made to place these mixed results in a theoretical context. The present article considers this issue through a strategic model of language that suggests different psychological processes apply to public politicians versus private citizens. We use a methodologically precise meta-analytic test of the relationship between political ideology and integrative complexity to examine the degree that conservative simplicity can be understood as a function of public versus private samples. Across 35 studies, findings revealed that conservatives are significantly less complex than liberals overall; however, while this effect was significant for public politicians, no relationship emerged for private citizens. Consistent with a strategic model, conservative simplicity was particularly in evidence for elected officials. This theoretical analysis has many consequences for our understanding of psychological theories that help explain the consequences of political ideology.",
keywords = "integrative complexity, meta-analysis, political ideology, political rhetoric, strategic communication",
author = "Shannon Houck and Conway, {Lucian Gideon}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12583",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic Communication and the Integrative Complexity-Ideology Relationship

T2 - Meta-Analytic Findings Reveal Differences Between Public Politicians and Private Citizens in Their Use of Simple Rhetoric

AU - Houck, Shannon

AU - Conway, Lucian Gideon

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Research on the relationship between political conservatism and integrative complexity has yielded contradictory results, and little effort has been made to place these mixed results in a theoretical context. The present article considers this issue through a strategic model of language that suggests different psychological processes apply to public politicians versus private citizens. We use a methodologically precise meta-analytic test of the relationship between political ideology and integrative complexity to examine the degree that conservative simplicity can be understood as a function of public versus private samples. Across 35 studies, findings revealed that conservatives are significantly less complex than liberals overall; however, while this effect was significant for public politicians, no relationship emerged for private citizens. Consistent with a strategic model, conservative simplicity was particularly in evidence for elected officials. This theoretical analysis has many consequences for our understanding of psychological theories that help explain the consequences of political ideology.

AB - Research on the relationship between political conservatism and integrative complexity has yielded contradictory results, and little effort has been made to place these mixed results in a theoretical context. The present article considers this issue through a strategic model of language that suggests different psychological processes apply to public politicians versus private citizens. We use a methodologically precise meta-analytic test of the relationship between political ideology and integrative complexity to examine the degree that conservative simplicity can be understood as a function of public versus private samples. Across 35 studies, findings revealed that conservatives are significantly less complex than liberals overall; however, while this effect was significant for public politicians, no relationship emerged for private citizens. Consistent with a strategic model, conservative simplicity was particularly in evidence for elected officials. This theoretical analysis has many consequences for our understanding of psychological theories that help explain the consequences of political ideology.

KW - integrative complexity

KW - meta-analysis

KW - political ideology

KW - political rhetoric

KW - strategic communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063429365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063429365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12583

DO - 10.1111/pops.12583

M3 - Article

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

ER -