Strange bedfellows: Public support for the Eu among regionalists

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Between 1979 and 1997, Scottish public support for European integration increased by 25 percent (Jowell, Heath, and Curtice 1998; Miller and Brand 1981), while support for European integration among all Europeans dropped nearly 14 percent (Schmitt and Scholz 2005). At the same time, Scottish public support for independence also increased dramatically, from 6.9 percent in 1979 to 34.3 percent in 1997. In addition, as early as 1997, a majority of Scottish citizens thought Scotland would be completely independent within twenty years (Brown, McCrone, and Patterson 1999: 147). While the European Union (EU) deepens, the United Kingdom itself seems ever more likely to fragment, or, at the very least, devolve further. Are these two trends linked? Regionalists, resentful of centralization and threats of homogenization, could perceive a deeper European Union either as yet another threat to their culture or as an ally in their broader bargaining game with the state. 1 If regionalists view the EU as a threat, then they should be skeptical of European integration, especially regarding political integration. I argue that substate nationalists more often view the EU as an ally, in large part by diminishing the advantages of incorporation in a large, multinational state. By this logic, substate nationalists should not only be supportive of the EU project, but they should also i nd autonomy itself, whether devolution or independence, a more viable and plausible prospect within a deeper European Union. In this chapter, I i rst test these competing logics and i nd that regionalists in Western Europe are Europhiles. Then I analyze the Scottish case in more detail and find that perceptions of Europe and Scotland’s role in it play an important role in the evolving attitudes toward devolution and independence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEurope's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages81-99
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9781139567558, 9781107036338
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

public support
European integration
threat
allies
decentralization
multinational state
political integration
centralization
Western Europe
autonomy
citizen
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Jolly, S. K. (2011). Strange bedfellows: Public support for the Eu among regionalists. In Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism (pp. 81-99). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567558.007

Strange bedfellows : Public support for the Eu among regionalists. / Jolly, Seth Kincaid.

Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 81-99.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Jolly, SK 2011, Strange bedfellows: Public support for the Eu among regionalists. in Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567558.007
Jolly SK. Strange bedfellows: Public support for the Eu among regionalists. In Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 81-99 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567558.007
Jolly, Seth Kincaid. / Strange bedfellows : Public support for the Eu among regionalists. Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 81-99
@inbook{159572818e954d8c9087d501f036d5c8,
title = "Strange bedfellows: Public support for the Eu among regionalists",
abstract = "Between 1979 and 1997, Scottish public support for European integration increased by 25 percent (Jowell, Heath, and Curtice 1998; Miller and Brand 1981), while support for European integration among all Europeans dropped nearly 14 percent (Schmitt and Scholz 2005). At the same time, Scottish public support for independence also increased dramatically, from 6.9 percent in 1979 to 34.3 percent in 1997. In addition, as early as 1997, a majority of Scottish citizens thought Scotland would be completely independent within twenty years (Brown, McCrone, and Patterson 1999: 147). While the European Union (EU) deepens, the United Kingdom itself seems ever more likely to fragment, or, at the very least, devolve further. Are these two trends linked? Regionalists, resentful of centralization and threats of homogenization, could perceive a deeper European Union either as yet another threat to their culture or as an ally in their broader bargaining game with the state. 1 If regionalists view the EU as a threat, then they should be skeptical of European integration, especially regarding political integration. I argue that substate nationalists more often view the EU as an ally, in large part by diminishing the advantages of incorporation in a large, multinational state. By this logic, substate nationalists should not only be supportive of the EU project, but they should also i nd autonomy itself, whether devolution or independence, a more viable and plausible prospect within a deeper European Union. In this chapter, I i rst test these competing logics and i nd that regionalists in Western Europe are Europhiles. Then I analyze the Scottish case in more detail and find that perceptions of Europe and Scotland’s role in it play an important role in the evolving attitudes toward devolution and independence.",
author = "Jolly, {Seth Kincaid}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139567558.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781139567558",
pages = "81--99",
booktitle = "Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Strange bedfellows

T2 - Public support for the Eu among regionalists

AU - Jolly, Seth Kincaid

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Between 1979 and 1997, Scottish public support for European integration increased by 25 percent (Jowell, Heath, and Curtice 1998; Miller and Brand 1981), while support for European integration among all Europeans dropped nearly 14 percent (Schmitt and Scholz 2005). At the same time, Scottish public support for independence also increased dramatically, from 6.9 percent in 1979 to 34.3 percent in 1997. In addition, as early as 1997, a majority of Scottish citizens thought Scotland would be completely independent within twenty years (Brown, McCrone, and Patterson 1999: 147). While the European Union (EU) deepens, the United Kingdom itself seems ever more likely to fragment, or, at the very least, devolve further. Are these two trends linked? Regionalists, resentful of centralization and threats of homogenization, could perceive a deeper European Union either as yet another threat to their culture or as an ally in their broader bargaining game with the state. 1 If regionalists view the EU as a threat, then they should be skeptical of European integration, especially regarding political integration. I argue that substate nationalists more often view the EU as an ally, in large part by diminishing the advantages of incorporation in a large, multinational state. By this logic, substate nationalists should not only be supportive of the EU project, but they should also i nd autonomy itself, whether devolution or independence, a more viable and plausible prospect within a deeper European Union. In this chapter, I i rst test these competing logics and i nd that regionalists in Western Europe are Europhiles. Then I analyze the Scottish case in more detail and find that perceptions of Europe and Scotland’s role in it play an important role in the evolving attitudes toward devolution and independence.

AB - Between 1979 and 1997, Scottish public support for European integration increased by 25 percent (Jowell, Heath, and Curtice 1998; Miller and Brand 1981), while support for European integration among all Europeans dropped nearly 14 percent (Schmitt and Scholz 2005). At the same time, Scottish public support for independence also increased dramatically, from 6.9 percent in 1979 to 34.3 percent in 1997. In addition, as early as 1997, a majority of Scottish citizens thought Scotland would be completely independent within twenty years (Brown, McCrone, and Patterson 1999: 147). While the European Union (EU) deepens, the United Kingdom itself seems ever more likely to fragment, or, at the very least, devolve further. Are these two trends linked? Regionalists, resentful of centralization and threats of homogenization, could perceive a deeper European Union either as yet another threat to their culture or as an ally in their broader bargaining game with the state. 1 If regionalists view the EU as a threat, then they should be skeptical of European integration, especially regarding political integration. I argue that substate nationalists more often view the EU as an ally, in large part by diminishing the advantages of incorporation in a large, multinational state. By this logic, substate nationalists should not only be supportive of the EU project, but they should also i nd autonomy itself, whether devolution or independence, a more viable and plausible prospect within a deeper European Union. In this chapter, I i rst test these competing logics and i nd that regionalists in Western Europe are Europhiles. Then I analyze the Scottish case in more detail and find that perceptions of Europe and Scotland’s role in it play an important role in the evolving attitudes toward devolution and independence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923459236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923459236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139567558.007

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139567558.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923459236

SN - 9781139567558

SN - 9781107036338

SP - 81

EP - 99

BT - Europe's Contending Identities: Supranationalism, Ethnoregionalism, Religion, and New Nationalism

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -