Stiffness increase of red blood cells during storage

Zhensong Xu, Yi Zheng, Xian Wang, Nadine Shehata, Chen Wang, Yu Sun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

In transfusion medicine, the deformability of stored red blood cells (RBCs) changes during storage in blood banks. Compromised RBC deformability can reduce the transfusion efficiency or intensify transfusion complications, such as sepsis. This paper reports the microfluidic mechanical measurement of stored RBCs under the physiological deformation mode (that is, folding). Instead of using phenomenological metrics of deformation or elongation indices (DI or EI), the effective stiffness of RBCs, a flow velocityindependent parameter, is defined and used for the first time to evaluate the mechanical degradation of RBCs during storage. Fresh RBCs and RBCs stored up to 6 weeks (42 days) in the blood bank were measured, revealing that the effective stiffness of RBCs increases over the storage process. RBCs stored for 1 week started to show significantly higher stiffness than fresh RBCs, and stored RBC stiffness degraded faster during the last 3 weeks than during the first 3 weeks. Furthermore, the results indicate that the time points of the effective stiffness increase coincide well with the degradation patterns of S-nitrosothiols (SNO) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in RBC storage lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17103
JournalMicrosystems and Nanoengineering
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • deformability
  • effective stiffness
  • microfluidics
  • red blood cell
  • storage lesions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Materials Science (miscellaneous)
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stiffness increase of red blood cells during storage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this