State Pension Accounting Estimates and Strong Public Unions

Samuel B. Bonsall, Johann Comprix, Karl A. Muller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Concerns are commonly raised that strong public unions extract generous pension benefits from state governments and are the cause of states' burdensome pension obligations. Prior research (Anzia and Moe 2015) finds evidence supporting such concerns. Consistent with incentives to minimize such perceptions, our findings suggest that state pension plans with stronger public unions select higher discount rates to improve reported funding levels. While riskier asset allocations are used to support the higher discount rates (which equal the expected return on the plan assets), most of the higher rates appear opportunistic. In addition, consistent with a desire to avoid drawing attention to persistent plan underfunding, our evidence indicates that stronger union plans are less likely to select longer amortization periods to recognize pension deficits when underfunding is larger. We do not, however, find evidence for asset smoothing periods being used to delay the recognition of investment losses on plan assets. Together, our findings suggest that stronger union plans take steps to make their pension obligations look less burdensome to the public.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalContemporary Accounting Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pension accounting
Pensions
Assets
Discount rate
Obligation
State government
Expected returns
Long period
Funding
Smoothing
Incentives
Pension plans
Asset allocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

State Pension Accounting Estimates and Strong Public Unions. / Bonsall, Samuel B.; Comprix, Johann; Muller, Karl A.

In: Contemporary Accounting Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f6af5f0e57e4762a686d13b3655ca31,
title = "State Pension Accounting Estimates and Strong Public Unions",
abstract = "Concerns are commonly raised that strong public unions extract generous pension benefits from state governments and are the cause of states' burdensome pension obligations. Prior research (Anzia and Moe 2015) finds evidence supporting such concerns. Consistent with incentives to minimize such perceptions, our findings suggest that state pension plans with stronger public unions select higher discount rates to improve reported funding levels. While riskier asset allocations are used to support the higher discount rates (which equal the expected return on the plan assets), most of the higher rates appear opportunistic. In addition, consistent with a desire to avoid drawing attention to persistent plan underfunding, our evidence indicates that stronger union plans are less likely to select longer amortization periods to recognize pension deficits when underfunding is larger. We do not, however, find evidence for asset smoothing periods being used to delay the recognition of investment losses on plan assets. Together, our findings suggest that stronger union plans take steps to make their pension obligations look less burdensome to the public.",
author = "Bonsall, {Samuel B.} and Johann Comprix and Muller, {Karl A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1911-3846.12476",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Contemporary Accounting Research",
issn = "0823-9150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State Pension Accounting Estimates and Strong Public Unions

AU - Bonsall, Samuel B.

AU - Comprix, Johann

AU - Muller, Karl A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Concerns are commonly raised that strong public unions extract generous pension benefits from state governments and are the cause of states' burdensome pension obligations. Prior research (Anzia and Moe 2015) finds evidence supporting such concerns. Consistent with incentives to minimize such perceptions, our findings suggest that state pension plans with stronger public unions select higher discount rates to improve reported funding levels. While riskier asset allocations are used to support the higher discount rates (which equal the expected return on the plan assets), most of the higher rates appear opportunistic. In addition, consistent with a desire to avoid drawing attention to persistent plan underfunding, our evidence indicates that stronger union plans are less likely to select longer amortization periods to recognize pension deficits when underfunding is larger. We do not, however, find evidence for asset smoothing periods being used to delay the recognition of investment losses on plan assets. Together, our findings suggest that stronger union plans take steps to make their pension obligations look less burdensome to the public.

AB - Concerns are commonly raised that strong public unions extract generous pension benefits from state governments and are the cause of states' burdensome pension obligations. Prior research (Anzia and Moe 2015) finds evidence supporting such concerns. Consistent with incentives to minimize such perceptions, our findings suggest that state pension plans with stronger public unions select higher discount rates to improve reported funding levels. While riskier asset allocations are used to support the higher discount rates (which equal the expected return on the plan assets), most of the higher rates appear opportunistic. In addition, consistent with a desire to avoid drawing attention to persistent plan underfunding, our evidence indicates that stronger union plans are less likely to select longer amortization periods to recognize pension deficits when underfunding is larger. We do not, however, find evidence for asset smoothing periods being used to delay the recognition of investment losses on plan assets. Together, our findings suggest that stronger union plans take steps to make their pension obligations look less burdensome to the public.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067342239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067342239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12476

DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12476

M3 - Article

JO - Contemporary Accounting Research

JF - Contemporary Accounting Research

SN - 0823-9150

ER -