Spelling error analysis of written summaries in an academic register by students with specific learning disabilities: phonological, orthographic, and morphological influences

Ruth Huntley Bahr, Stephanie Lebby, Louise C Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Students in grades 5–9 (N = 29) with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) (dysgraphia, dyslexia, or oral and written language learning disability, OWL LD) were asked to take notes and handwrite or type summaries of social studies texts about world geography and cultures that they read or heard. This activity required activating knowledge of academic language for the disciplinary content. Fine-grained analyses of their spelling errors focused on the phonological, orthographic and morphological aspects of word spelling affected while writing in an academic register. Nonparametric statistical analyses revealed no significant differences attributable to SLD diagnosis or combinations of the mode of the source text (reading or listening) and transcription (handwriting with stylus or typing with keyboard). Students generated similar degrees of error complexity in their spelling errors when writing in this disciplinary academic register regardless of the nature of their SLD, mode of presentation of source texts, or mode of transcription. Three types of common misspelling patterns across SLDs, mode of presentation, and mode of transcription are described in this exploratory study. Instructional applications for teaching students with SLDs to spell words in English, a morphophonemic orthography, when composing in an academic register are discussed as well as proposed future research directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalReading and Writing
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
Students
student
Language
Agraphia
Handwriting
Dyslexia
Geography
handwriting
orthography
written language
dyslexia
social studies
Reading
Teaching
school grade
geography
language

Keywords

  • Academic vocabulary
  • Academic writing
  • Handwriting
  • Specific learning disability
  • Spelling
  • Typing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{487d12d36f87439eb12a3f61d92ebc52,
title = "Spelling error analysis of written summaries in an academic register by students with specific learning disabilities: phonological, orthographic, and morphological influences",
abstract = "Students in grades 5–9 (N = 29) with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) (dysgraphia, dyslexia, or oral and written language learning disability, OWL LD) were asked to take notes and handwrite or type summaries of social studies texts about world geography and cultures that they read or heard. This activity required activating knowledge of academic language for the disciplinary content. Fine-grained analyses of their spelling errors focused on the phonological, orthographic and morphological aspects of word spelling affected while writing in an academic register. Nonparametric statistical analyses revealed no significant differences attributable to SLD diagnosis or combinations of the mode of the source text (reading or listening) and transcription (handwriting with stylus or typing with keyboard). Students generated similar degrees of error complexity in their spelling errors when writing in this disciplinary academic register regardless of the nature of their SLD, mode of presentation of source texts, or mode of transcription. Three types of common misspelling patterns across SLDs, mode of presentation, and mode of transcription are described in this exploratory study. Instructional applications for teaching students with SLDs to spell words in English, a morphophonemic orthography, when composing in an academic register are discussed as well as proposed future research directions.",
keywords = "Academic vocabulary, Academic writing, Handwriting, Specific learning disability, Spelling, Typing",
author = "Bahr, {Ruth Huntley} and Stephanie Lebby and Wilkinson, {Louise C}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11145-019-09977-0",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Reading and Writing",
issn = "0922-4777",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spelling error analysis of written summaries in an academic register by students with specific learning disabilities

T2 - phonological, orthographic, and morphological influences

AU - Bahr, Ruth Huntley

AU - Lebby, Stephanie

AU - Wilkinson, Louise C

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Students in grades 5–9 (N = 29) with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) (dysgraphia, dyslexia, or oral and written language learning disability, OWL LD) were asked to take notes and handwrite or type summaries of social studies texts about world geography and cultures that they read or heard. This activity required activating knowledge of academic language for the disciplinary content. Fine-grained analyses of their spelling errors focused on the phonological, orthographic and morphological aspects of word spelling affected while writing in an academic register. Nonparametric statistical analyses revealed no significant differences attributable to SLD diagnosis or combinations of the mode of the source text (reading or listening) and transcription (handwriting with stylus or typing with keyboard). Students generated similar degrees of error complexity in their spelling errors when writing in this disciplinary academic register regardless of the nature of their SLD, mode of presentation of source texts, or mode of transcription. Three types of common misspelling patterns across SLDs, mode of presentation, and mode of transcription are described in this exploratory study. Instructional applications for teaching students with SLDs to spell words in English, a morphophonemic orthography, when composing in an academic register are discussed as well as proposed future research directions.

AB - Students in grades 5–9 (N = 29) with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) (dysgraphia, dyslexia, or oral and written language learning disability, OWL LD) were asked to take notes and handwrite or type summaries of social studies texts about world geography and cultures that they read or heard. This activity required activating knowledge of academic language for the disciplinary content. Fine-grained analyses of their spelling errors focused on the phonological, orthographic and morphological aspects of word spelling affected while writing in an academic register. Nonparametric statistical analyses revealed no significant differences attributable to SLD diagnosis or combinations of the mode of the source text (reading or listening) and transcription (handwriting with stylus or typing with keyboard). Students generated similar degrees of error complexity in their spelling errors when writing in this disciplinary academic register regardless of the nature of their SLD, mode of presentation of source texts, or mode of transcription. Three types of common misspelling patterns across SLDs, mode of presentation, and mode of transcription are described in this exploratory study. Instructional applications for teaching students with SLDs to spell words in English, a morphophonemic orthography, when composing in an academic register are discussed as well as proposed future research directions.

KW - Academic vocabulary

KW - Academic writing

KW - Handwriting

KW - Specific learning disability

KW - Spelling

KW - Typing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072033969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072033969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11145-019-09977-0

DO - 10.1007/s11145-019-09977-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072033969

JO - Reading and Writing

JF - Reading and Writing

SN - 0922-4777

ER -