South Africa as an Immigration State

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A dramatic outburst of xenophobic violence in May 2008 spotlighted South Africa's place among countries of immigration. While a plethora of policy studies have examined many micro-level dynamics in these attacks, surprisingly little attention has been paid to underlying political causes. By applying the comparative 'immigration state' literature, I offer a counter-intuitive, two-part explanation for the complex and often contradictory mix of South African migration policies. First, the historical absence of a 'rights-markets' coalition allows for the persistence of exclusionary and protectionist legislation. Second, post-apartheid international commitments to 'rights-markets' norms have contributed to significant reforms, especially regarding refugees, but these pressures have not fully counter-balanced the predominant exclusionary and protectionist coalition. Democratization in the absence of a liberal 'rights-markets' coalition, I conclude, has reinforced xenophobia and will continue to produce only incremental policy reforms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-208
Number of pages20
JournalPolitikon
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

coalition
immigration
market
xenophobia
policy studies
migration policy
reform policy
micro level
apartheid
democratization
refugee
persistence
legislation
commitment
violence
reform
cause
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

South Africa as an Immigration State. / Klotz, Audie.

In: Politikon, Vol. 39, No. 2, 08.2012, p. 189-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klotz, Audie. / South Africa as an Immigration State. In: Politikon. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 189-208.
@article{6eec2c5e12f441e68715740841baa5d1,
title = "South Africa as an Immigration State",
abstract = "A dramatic outburst of xenophobic violence in May 2008 spotlighted South Africa's place among countries of immigration. While a plethora of policy studies have examined many micro-level dynamics in these attacks, surprisingly little attention has been paid to underlying political causes. By applying the comparative 'immigration state' literature, I offer a counter-intuitive, two-part explanation for the complex and often contradictory mix of South African migration policies. First, the historical absence of a 'rights-markets' coalition allows for the persistence of exclusionary and protectionist legislation. Second, post-apartheid international commitments to 'rights-markets' norms have contributed to significant reforms, especially regarding refugees, but these pressures have not fully counter-balanced the predominant exclusionary and protectionist coalition. Democratization in the absence of a liberal 'rights-markets' coalition, I conclude, has reinforced xenophobia and will continue to produce only incremental policy reforms.",
author = "Audie Klotz",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/02589346.2012.683939",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "189--208",
journal = "Politikon",
issn = "0258-9346",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - South Africa as an Immigration State

AU - Klotz, Audie

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - A dramatic outburst of xenophobic violence in May 2008 spotlighted South Africa's place among countries of immigration. While a plethora of policy studies have examined many micro-level dynamics in these attacks, surprisingly little attention has been paid to underlying political causes. By applying the comparative 'immigration state' literature, I offer a counter-intuitive, two-part explanation for the complex and often contradictory mix of South African migration policies. First, the historical absence of a 'rights-markets' coalition allows for the persistence of exclusionary and protectionist legislation. Second, post-apartheid international commitments to 'rights-markets' norms have contributed to significant reforms, especially regarding refugees, but these pressures have not fully counter-balanced the predominant exclusionary and protectionist coalition. Democratization in the absence of a liberal 'rights-markets' coalition, I conclude, has reinforced xenophobia and will continue to produce only incremental policy reforms.

AB - A dramatic outburst of xenophobic violence in May 2008 spotlighted South Africa's place among countries of immigration. While a plethora of policy studies have examined many micro-level dynamics in these attacks, surprisingly little attention has been paid to underlying political causes. By applying the comparative 'immigration state' literature, I offer a counter-intuitive, two-part explanation for the complex and often contradictory mix of South African migration policies. First, the historical absence of a 'rights-markets' coalition allows for the persistence of exclusionary and protectionist legislation. Second, post-apartheid international commitments to 'rights-markets' norms have contributed to significant reforms, especially regarding refugees, but these pressures have not fully counter-balanced the predominant exclusionary and protectionist coalition. Democratization in the absence of a liberal 'rights-markets' coalition, I conclude, has reinforced xenophobia and will continue to produce only incremental policy reforms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863507067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863507067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02589346.2012.683939

DO - 10.1080/02589346.2012.683939

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 189

EP - 208

JO - Politikon

JF - Politikon

SN - 0258-9346

IS - 2

ER -