Social reproduction and capitalist production

A genealogy of dominant imaginaries

Jamie L Winders, Barbara Ellen Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article offers a critical genealogy of the dominant imaginaries through which social reproduction, particularly in relation to capitalist production, has been examined in key feminist literatures since the 1960s. Feminist scholars have long observed that the distinction between production and social reproduction in capitalist societies manifests as an opposition between ‘work’ and ‘home,’ but they have implicitly envisioned and interpreted that opposition in diverse ways that crucially connect with geography. We offer this analysis in order to clarify how different imaginaries embedded in and shaping approaches to social reproduction both illuminate and occlude the social reproduction-production nexus. Although this critical genealogy leaves us better prepared to address conceptual shortcomings within different understandings of this nexus, we still lack an approach that grasps the complex workings of this interface in a moment of rising precarité across the globe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalProgress in Human Geography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

capitalist production
genealogy
opposition
capitalist society
geography
lack

Keywords

  • domestic labor
  • feminist geography
  • production
  • social reproduction
  • work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Social reproduction and capitalist production : A genealogy of dominant imaginaries. / Winders, Jamie L; Smith, Barbara Ellen.

In: Progress in Human Geography, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0da8d4f7445c49ba8bbd6d3222183dc6,
title = "Social reproduction and capitalist production: A genealogy of dominant imaginaries",
abstract = "This article offers a critical genealogy of the dominant imaginaries through which social reproduction, particularly in relation to capitalist production, has been examined in key feminist literatures since the 1960s. Feminist scholars have long observed that the distinction between production and social reproduction in capitalist societies manifests as an opposition between ‘work’ and ‘home,’ but they have implicitly envisioned and interpreted that opposition in diverse ways that crucially connect with geography. We offer this analysis in order to clarify how different imaginaries embedded in and shaping approaches to social reproduction both illuminate and occlude the social reproduction-production nexus. Although this critical genealogy leaves us better prepared to address conceptual shortcomings within different understandings of this nexus, we still lack an approach that grasps the complex workings of this interface in a moment of rising precarit{\'e} across the globe.",
keywords = "domestic labor, feminist geography, production, social reproduction, work",
author = "Winders, {Jamie L} and Smith, {Barbara Ellen}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0309132518791730",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Progress in Human Geography",
issn = "0309-1325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social reproduction and capitalist production

T2 - A genealogy of dominant imaginaries

AU - Winders, Jamie L

AU - Smith, Barbara Ellen

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article offers a critical genealogy of the dominant imaginaries through which social reproduction, particularly in relation to capitalist production, has been examined in key feminist literatures since the 1960s. Feminist scholars have long observed that the distinction between production and social reproduction in capitalist societies manifests as an opposition between ‘work’ and ‘home,’ but they have implicitly envisioned and interpreted that opposition in diverse ways that crucially connect with geography. We offer this analysis in order to clarify how different imaginaries embedded in and shaping approaches to social reproduction both illuminate and occlude the social reproduction-production nexus. Although this critical genealogy leaves us better prepared to address conceptual shortcomings within different understandings of this nexus, we still lack an approach that grasps the complex workings of this interface in a moment of rising precarité across the globe.

AB - This article offers a critical genealogy of the dominant imaginaries through which social reproduction, particularly in relation to capitalist production, has been examined in key feminist literatures since the 1960s. Feminist scholars have long observed that the distinction between production and social reproduction in capitalist societies manifests as an opposition between ‘work’ and ‘home,’ but they have implicitly envisioned and interpreted that opposition in diverse ways that crucially connect with geography. We offer this analysis in order to clarify how different imaginaries embedded in and shaping approaches to social reproduction both illuminate and occlude the social reproduction-production nexus. Although this critical genealogy leaves us better prepared to address conceptual shortcomings within different understandings of this nexus, we still lack an approach that grasps the complex workings of this interface in a moment of rising precarité across the globe.

KW - domestic labor

KW - feminist geography

KW - production

KW - social reproduction

KW - work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052592577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052592577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0309132518791730

DO - 10.1177/0309132518791730

M3 - Article

JO - Progress in Human Geography

JF - Progress in Human Geography

SN - 0309-1325

ER -