So Many Hospitals, So Little Information

How Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Is a Game of Chance

Andrew I. Friedson, William C Horrace, Allison F. Marier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, participating hospitals have part of their Medicare reimbursements withheld and then redistributed based on quality performance. The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing reimbursement plan relies partly on ordinal rankings of hospitals to determine how money is distributed. We analyze the quality metric score distributions that underlie payment redistribution and show that there is not enough information to reliably differentiate hospitals from one another near the program point cutoffs, and conclude that a large part of the payment formula is driven by sampling variability rather than true quality information. An alternative plan for rewarding hospitals is developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSouthern Economic Journal
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Purchasing
Reimbursement
Payment
Ranking
Medicare
Quality information
Redistribution
Quality metrics
Sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

So Many Hospitals, So Little Information : How Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Is a Game of Chance. / Friedson, Andrew I.; Horrace, William C; Marier, Allison F.

In: Southern Economic Journal, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d6a34727bbb47c28af70abf9fbad2e7,
title = "So Many Hospitals, So Little Information: How Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Is a Game of Chance",
abstract = "As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, participating hospitals have part of their Medicare reimbursements withheld and then redistributed based on quality performance. The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing reimbursement plan relies partly on ordinal rankings of hospitals to determine how money is distributed. We analyze the quality metric score distributions that underlie payment redistribution and show that there is not enough information to reliably differentiate hospitals from one another near the program point cutoffs, and conclude that a large part of the payment formula is driven by sampling variability rather than true quality information. An alternative plan for rewarding hospitals is developed.",
author = "Friedson, {Andrew I.} and Horrace, {William C} and Marier, {Allison F.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/soej.12375",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Southern Economic Journal",
issn = "0038-4038",
publisher = "Southern Economic Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - So Many Hospitals, So Little Information

T2 - How Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Is a Game of Chance

AU - Friedson, Andrew I.

AU - Horrace, William C

AU - Marier, Allison F.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, participating hospitals have part of their Medicare reimbursements withheld and then redistributed based on quality performance. The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing reimbursement plan relies partly on ordinal rankings of hospitals to determine how money is distributed. We analyze the quality metric score distributions that underlie payment redistribution and show that there is not enough information to reliably differentiate hospitals from one another near the program point cutoffs, and conclude that a large part of the payment formula is driven by sampling variability rather than true quality information. An alternative plan for rewarding hospitals is developed.

AB - As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, participating hospitals have part of their Medicare reimbursements withheld and then redistributed based on quality performance. The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing reimbursement plan relies partly on ordinal rankings of hospitals to determine how money is distributed. We analyze the quality metric score distributions that underlie payment redistribution and show that there is not enough information to reliably differentiate hospitals from one another near the program point cutoffs, and conclude that a large part of the payment formula is driven by sampling variability rather than true quality information. An alternative plan for rewarding hospitals is developed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067342115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067342115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/soej.12375

DO - 10.1002/soej.12375

M3 - Article

JO - Southern Economic Journal

JF - Southern Economic Journal

SN - 0038-4038

ER -