Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Graffiti are universal communicative artifacts. For example, epigraphologists used the graffiti found on the walls of the city of Pompeii, which was destroyed by a volcano in A.D. 79, to accurately reconstruct many cultural features of the people who inhabited the city (D'Avino, 1964; Lindsay, 1960; Tanzers, 1939; Varone, 1991). No doubt, most peoples and cultures throughout the world anonymously write, draw, and paint on walls and other surfaces. These acts are inherently social. As Bruner and Kelso (1980) astutely observe, "although [often] written in the privacy of a toilet stall, the writing of graffiti is an essentially social act.... To write graffiti is to communicate; one never finds graffiti where they cannot be seen by others" (p. 241). Yet graffiti remain relatively absent in communication inquiry and ethnographic research (for exceptions see Conquergood, 1994; Rodriguez and Clair, 1999; Scheibel, 1994). Communication scholars and ethnographers seem to still assume that graffiti have no communicative value. It is supposedly the doing of deviant and delinquent minds (Abel and Buckley, 1977; Dundes, 1966; Gaylin and Jennings, 1996; Klein, 1974; Opler, 1974).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationExpressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods
PublisherState University of New York Press
Pages231-240
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)0791458237, 9780791458235
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

graffiti
artifact
communication
privacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Rodriguez, A. (2003). Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces. In Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods (pp. 231-240). State University of New York Press.

Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces. / Rodriguez, Amardo.

Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods. State University of New York Press, 2003. p. 231-240.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rodriguez, A 2003, Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces. in Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods. State University of New York Press, pp. 231-240.
Rodriguez A. Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces. In Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods. State University of New York Press. 2003. p. 231-240
Rodriguez, Amardo. / Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces. Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods. State University of New York Press, 2003. pp. 231-240
@inbook{9214fef4ac5140b39114c056405cadbd,
title = "Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces",
abstract = "Graffiti are universal communicative artifacts. For example, epigraphologists used the graffiti found on the walls of the city of Pompeii, which was destroyed by a volcano in A.D. 79, to accurately reconstruct many cultural features of the people who inhabited the city (D'Avino, 1964; Lindsay, 1960; Tanzers, 1939; Varone, 1991). No doubt, most peoples and cultures throughout the world anonymously write, draw, and paint on walls and other surfaces. These acts are inherently social. As Bruner and Kelso (1980) astutely observe, {"}although [often] written in the privacy of a toilet stall, the writing of graffiti is an essentially social act.... To write graffiti is to communicate; one never finds graffiti where they cannot be seen by others{"} (p. 241). Yet graffiti remain relatively absent in communication inquiry and ethnographic research (for exceptions see Conquergood, 1994; Rodriguez and Clair, 1999; Scheibel, 1994). Communication scholars and ethnographers seem to still assume that graffiti have no communicative value. It is supposedly the doing of deviant and delinquent minds (Abel and Buckley, 1977; Dundes, 1966; Gaylin and Jennings, 1996; Klein, 1974; Opler, 1974).",
author = "Amardo Rodriguez",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0791458237",
pages = "231--240",
booktitle = "Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods",
publisher = "State University of New York Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces

AU - Rodriguez, Amardo

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Graffiti are universal communicative artifacts. For example, epigraphologists used the graffiti found on the walls of the city of Pompeii, which was destroyed by a volcano in A.D. 79, to accurately reconstruct many cultural features of the people who inhabited the city (D'Avino, 1964; Lindsay, 1960; Tanzers, 1939; Varone, 1991). No doubt, most peoples and cultures throughout the world anonymously write, draw, and paint on walls and other surfaces. These acts are inherently social. As Bruner and Kelso (1980) astutely observe, "although [often] written in the privacy of a toilet stall, the writing of graffiti is an essentially social act.... To write graffiti is to communicate; one never finds graffiti where they cannot be seen by others" (p. 241). Yet graffiti remain relatively absent in communication inquiry and ethnographic research (for exceptions see Conquergood, 1994; Rodriguez and Clair, 1999; Scheibel, 1994). Communication scholars and ethnographers seem to still assume that graffiti have no communicative value. It is supposedly the doing of deviant and delinquent minds (Abel and Buckley, 1977; Dundes, 1966; Gaylin and Jennings, 1996; Klein, 1974; Opler, 1974).

AB - Graffiti are universal communicative artifacts. For example, epigraphologists used the graffiti found on the walls of the city of Pompeii, which was destroyed by a volcano in A.D. 79, to accurately reconstruct many cultural features of the people who inhabited the city (D'Avino, 1964; Lindsay, 1960; Tanzers, 1939; Varone, 1991). No doubt, most peoples and cultures throughout the world anonymously write, draw, and paint on walls and other surfaces. These acts are inherently social. As Bruner and Kelso (1980) astutely observe, "although [often] written in the privacy of a toilet stall, the writing of graffiti is an essentially social act.... To write graffiti is to communicate; one never finds graffiti where they cannot be seen by others" (p. 241). Yet graffiti remain relatively absent in communication inquiry and ethnographic research (for exceptions see Conquergood, 1994; Rodriguez and Clair, 1999; Scheibel, 1994). Communication scholars and ethnographers seem to still assume that graffiti have no communicative value. It is supposedly the doing of deviant and delinquent minds (Abel and Buckley, 1977; Dundes, 1966; Gaylin and Jennings, 1996; Klein, 1974; Opler, 1974).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896560755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896560755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84896560755

SN - 0791458237

SN - 9780791458235

SP - 231

EP - 240

BT - Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods

PB - State University of New York Press

ER -