Scientific hermeneutics: A tale of two Hayeks

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hayek favored both classical hermeneutics and science. His scientific reasoning shows the logical necessity of methodological dualism. Bruce Caldwell and Viktor Vanberg oppose hermeneutics and methodological dualism in favor of science. Their arguments depend on inappropriate interpretations of the doctrine of methodological dualism and an impoverished understanding of hermeneutics that fails to distinguish classical hermeneutics from universal hermeneutics. Hayek showed that "scientific" and "humanistic" approaches to social science can and should be compatible and complementary. Opposing (classical) hermeneutics in favor of science may cause a loss of knowledge by tending to deprive "scientific" social science of insights arising from more "humanistic" traditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationExplorations in Austrian Economics
EditorsRoger Koppl
Pages99-122
Number of pages24
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 2008
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAdvances in Austrian Economics
Volume11
ISSN (Print)1529-2134

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Scientific hermeneutics: A tale of two Hayeks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Koppl, R. (2008). Scientific hermeneutics: A tale of two Hayeks. In R. Koppl (Ed.), Explorations in Austrian Economics (pp. 99-122). (Advances in Austrian Economics; Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-2134(08)11006-7