TY - JOUR
T1 - Satisfaction, safety, and supports
T2 - Comparing people with disabilities’ insider experiences about participation in institutional and community living
AU - Sheth, Alisa Jordan
AU - McDonald, Katherine E.
AU - Fogg, Louis
AU - Conroy, Nicole E.
AU - Elms, Edward H.J.
AU - Kraus, Lewis E.
AU - Frieden, Lex
AU - Hammel, Joy
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) under grants 90DP0026 and 90DPAD0001. NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) under grants 90DP0026 and 90DPAD0001 . NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the policy of the NIDILRR, ACL, or HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank the entire Americans with Disabilities Act Participatory Action Research Consortium network of collaborators, especially the following organizations for their assistance and support of this research project: Access Living (Illinois), Accessible Resources for Independence (Maryland), Bay Area Center for Independent Living (Maryland), Liberty Resources (Pennsylvania), North Carolina Statewide Independent Living Council, North Carolina Independent Living Centers, North Carolina Money Follows the Person, Thresholds (Illinois), Transitional Paths to Independent Living (Pennsylvania), Valley Associates for Independent Living (Virginia).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Background: Legislation and court decisions in the United States mandate the right to least restrictive community living and participation for people with disabilities, yet little research has examined differences in participation across institutional and community settings, or over time in the community post-transition. Objective: As part of a multi-site participatory action research project examining participation, we examined the differences in quality of life in institutional and community living environments among people with disabilities. Methods: We conducted surveys with adults with disabilities between 18 and 65 years-old that transitioned from institutions to the community in the United States within the last five years. This paper reports on findings for a diverse sample of 150 participants. Results: We found significant differences between ratings of institutional and community experiences, with increased reports of satisfaction, personal safety, service access, and participation in community settings. We also found significant improvements in community integration and inclusion after transition to community living, although barriers to transportation and activity access often remained. Conclusions: This study of insider experiences of previously institutionalized people with disabilities illuminates important understandings of community participation, integration, and quality of life for the disability community in the United States.
AB - Background: Legislation and court decisions in the United States mandate the right to least restrictive community living and participation for people with disabilities, yet little research has examined differences in participation across institutional and community settings, or over time in the community post-transition. Objective: As part of a multi-site participatory action research project examining participation, we examined the differences in quality of life in institutional and community living environments among people with disabilities. Methods: We conducted surveys with adults with disabilities between 18 and 65 years-old that transitioned from institutions to the community in the United States within the last five years. This paper reports on findings for a diverse sample of 150 participants. Results: We found significant differences between ratings of institutional and community experiences, with increased reports of satisfaction, personal safety, service access, and participation in community settings. We also found significant improvements in community integration and inclusion after transition to community living, although barriers to transportation and activity access often remained. Conclusions: This study of insider experiences of previously institutionalized people with disabilities illuminates important understandings of community participation, integration, and quality of life for the disability community in the United States.
KW - Community integration
KW - Deinstitutionalization
KW - Disability
KW - Participation
KW - Transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067988176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067988176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.011
DO - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 31262701
AN - SCOPUS:85067988176
SN - 1936-6574
VL - 12
SP - 712
EP - 717
JO - Disability and Health Journal
JF - Disability and Health Journal
IS - 4
ER -