Rural/urban differences in self-rated health: Examining the roles of county size and metropolitan adjacency

Shannon M. Monnat, Camille Beeler Pickett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research explored the roles of 'rurality' - nonmetropolitan county population size and adjacency to metropolitan areas - on self-rated health among a nationally representative sample of US adults. Using seven years of pooled individual level data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and county-level data from the County Characteristics survey, we found that residents of remote rural counties have the greatest odds of reporting bad health and that the significant differences in self-rated health between metropolitan residents and residents of rural areas can be entirely explained by rural structural disadvantage, including higher rates of unemployment and population loss and lower levels of educational attainment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-319
Number of pages9
JournalHealth and Place
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Disparities
  • Health
  • Metropolitan adjacency
  • Rurality
  • Urban

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rural/urban differences in self-rated health: Examining the roles of county size and metropolitan adjacency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this