Abstract
Most decisions involve variability in two dimensions: uncertainty across states of nature and fluctuations over time. The stakes involved in tradeoffs between these variability dimensions are especially high for the poor who have difficulty managing and recovering from shocks. We assume Epstein and Zin recursive preferences and estimate risk aversion and intertemporal substitution as distinct preferences using data from Kenyan herders. Results suggest that the assumption implicit in additive expected utility models that relative risk aversion (RRA) is the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution (EIS) is flawed. Specifically, our RRA and EIS estimates are consistent with a preference for the early resolution of uncertainty, which we believe is driven importantly by the instrumental value of early uncertainty resolution. This same preference pattern is consistent with asset smoothing in response to a dynamic asset threshold.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 415-426 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Development Economics |
Volume | 97 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2012 |
Keywords
- Asset dynamics
- Elasticity of intertemporal substitution
- Poverty
- Recursive utility
- Risk aversion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Economics and Econometrics