Revisiting the 'Gadgil effect': Do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils?

Christopher W. Fernandez, Peter G. Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

288 Scopus citations


In forest ecosystems, ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi play a central role in the breakdown of soil organic matter (SOM). Competition between these two fungal guilds has long been hypothesized to lead to suppression of decomposition rates, a phenomenon known as the 'Gadgil effect'. In this review, we examine the documentation, generality, and potential mechanisms involved in the 'Gadgil effect'. We find that the influence of ectomycorrhizal fungi on litter and SOM decomposition is much more variable than previously recognized. To explain the inconsistency in size and direction of the 'Gadgil effect', we argue that a better understanding of underlying mechanisms is required. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each of the primary mechanisms proposed to date and how using different experimental methods (trenching, girdling, microcosms), as well as considering different temporal and spatial scales, could influence the conclusions drawn about this phenomenon. Finally, we suggest that combining new research tools such as high-throughput sequencing with experiments utilizing natural environmental gradients will significantly deepen our understanding of the 'Gadgil effect' and its consequences on forest soil carbon and nutrient cycling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1382-1394
Number of pages13
JournalNew Phytologist
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes


  • Carbon sequestration
  • Competition
  • Decomposition
  • Ectomycorrhizal fungi Gadgil effect
  • Litter
  • Nitrogen cycle
  • Saprotrophic fungi
  • Soil organic matter (SOM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Plant Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the 'Gadgil effect': Do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this