Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus?

Matthew Andrews, William Duncombe, John McHenry Yinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Consolidation remains a common policy recommendation of state governments looking to improve efficiency, especially in rural school districts. However, state policies encouraging consolidation have increasingly been challenged as fostering learning environments that hurt student performance. Does the empirical research on economies of size support for this policy? The objective of this paper is to define the factors affecting economies of size and update the literature since 1980. The best of the cost function studies suggest that sizeable potential cost savings in instructional and administrative costs may exist by moving from a very small district (500 or fewer pupils) to a district with ca 2000-4000 pupils. The findings from production function studies of schools are less consistent, but there is some evidence that moderately sized elementary schools (300-500 students) and high schools (600-900 students) may optimally balance economies of size with the potential negative effects of large schools. Since program evaluation research on school consolidation is limited, it is time for researchers on both sides of this debate to make good evaluation research on consolidation a high priority. In addition, the potential diseconomies of size in large central city school districts needs increased attention in academic research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-262
Number of pages18
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

consolidation
economy
district
evaluation research
school
education
pupil
costs
rural school
student
production function
elementary school
savings
empirical research
learning environment
Consolidation
Education
efficiency
performance
evidence

Keywords

  • Costs
  • Economies of scale
  • Efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Education

Cite this

Revisiting economies of size in American education : Are we any closer to a consensus? / Andrews, Matthew; Duncombe, William; Yinger, John McHenry.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2002, p. 245-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d253cea25fee4aa2b7c16bf001504b22,
title = "Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus?",
abstract = "Consolidation remains a common policy recommendation of state governments looking to improve efficiency, especially in rural school districts. However, state policies encouraging consolidation have increasingly been challenged as fostering learning environments that hurt student performance. Does the empirical research on economies of size support for this policy? The objective of this paper is to define the factors affecting economies of size and update the literature since 1980. The best of the cost function studies suggest that sizeable potential cost savings in instructional and administrative costs may exist by moving from a very small district (500 or fewer pupils) to a district with ca 2000-4000 pupils. The findings from production function studies of schools are less consistent, but there is some evidence that moderately sized elementary schools (300-500 students) and high schools (600-900 students) may optimally balance economies of size with the potential negative effects of large schools. Since program evaluation research on school consolidation is limited, it is time for researchers on both sides of this debate to make good evaluation research on consolidation a high priority. In addition, the potential diseconomies of size in large central city school districts needs increased attention in academic research.",
keywords = "Costs, Economies of scale, Efficiency",
author = "Matthew Andrews and William Duncombe and Yinger, {John McHenry}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00006-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "245--262",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting economies of size in American education

T2 - Are we any closer to a consensus?

AU - Andrews, Matthew

AU - Duncombe, William

AU - Yinger, John McHenry

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Consolidation remains a common policy recommendation of state governments looking to improve efficiency, especially in rural school districts. However, state policies encouraging consolidation have increasingly been challenged as fostering learning environments that hurt student performance. Does the empirical research on economies of size support for this policy? The objective of this paper is to define the factors affecting economies of size and update the literature since 1980. The best of the cost function studies suggest that sizeable potential cost savings in instructional and administrative costs may exist by moving from a very small district (500 or fewer pupils) to a district with ca 2000-4000 pupils. The findings from production function studies of schools are less consistent, but there is some evidence that moderately sized elementary schools (300-500 students) and high schools (600-900 students) may optimally balance economies of size with the potential negative effects of large schools. Since program evaluation research on school consolidation is limited, it is time for researchers on both sides of this debate to make good evaluation research on consolidation a high priority. In addition, the potential diseconomies of size in large central city school districts needs increased attention in academic research.

AB - Consolidation remains a common policy recommendation of state governments looking to improve efficiency, especially in rural school districts. However, state policies encouraging consolidation have increasingly been challenged as fostering learning environments that hurt student performance. Does the empirical research on economies of size support for this policy? The objective of this paper is to define the factors affecting economies of size and update the literature since 1980. The best of the cost function studies suggest that sizeable potential cost savings in instructional and administrative costs may exist by moving from a very small district (500 or fewer pupils) to a district with ca 2000-4000 pupils. The findings from production function studies of schools are less consistent, but there is some evidence that moderately sized elementary schools (300-500 students) and high schools (600-900 students) may optimally balance economies of size with the potential negative effects of large schools. Since program evaluation research on school consolidation is limited, it is time for researchers on both sides of this debate to make good evaluation research on consolidation a high priority. In addition, the potential diseconomies of size in large central city school districts needs increased attention in academic research.

KW - Costs

KW - Economies of scale

KW - Efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036256848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036256848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00006-1

DO - 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00006-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036256848

VL - 21

SP - 245

EP - 262

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

IS - 3

ER -