Retrograde amnesia: Storage failure versus retrieval failure

Paul Ernest Gold, Richard A. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Retrograde amnesia is generally taken as evidence for the disruption of memory storage processes. Recently, R. R. Miller and A. D. Springer (see record 1973-20263-001) proposed that retrograde amnesia is the result of a (usually) reversible retrieval block and not the result of interference with memory storage processes. "Reminder" studies provide the principal data on which their theory is based. The reminder studies are reviewed, as well as other recent studies which are purported to support the retrieval block hypothesis. It is concluded that the findings of these studies are compatible with storage interpretations of retrograde amnesia and have little bearing on the interpretation of retrograde amnesia. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-469
Number of pages5
JournalPsychological Review
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1974
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Retrograde Amnesia
Amnesia

Keywords

  • memory storage disruption vs reversible retrieval block, retrograde amnesia, proposals of R. R. Miller & A. D. Springer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Retrograde amnesia : Storage failure versus retrieval failure. / Gold, Paul Ernest; King, Richard A.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 81, No. 5, 09.1974, p. 465-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{31b1ec4122f64f098498f42cedf37a4b,
title = "Retrograde amnesia: Storage failure versus retrieval failure",
abstract = "Retrograde amnesia is generally taken as evidence for the disruption of memory storage processes. Recently, R. R. Miller and A. D. Springer (see record 1973-20263-001) proposed that retrograde amnesia is the result of a (usually) reversible retrieval block and not the result of interference with memory storage processes. {"}Reminder{"} studies provide the principal data on which their theory is based. The reminder studies are reviewed, as well as other recent studies which are purported to support the retrieval block hypothesis. It is concluded that the findings of these studies are compatible with storage interpretations of retrograde amnesia and have little bearing on the interpretation of retrograde amnesia. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "memory storage disruption vs reversible retrieval block, retrograde amnesia, proposals of R. R. Miller & A. D. Springer",
author = "Gold, {Paul Ernest} and King, {Richard A.}",
year = "1974",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/h0036949",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "465--469",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrograde amnesia

T2 - Storage failure versus retrieval failure

AU - Gold, Paul Ernest

AU - King, Richard A.

PY - 1974/9

Y1 - 1974/9

N2 - Retrograde amnesia is generally taken as evidence for the disruption of memory storage processes. Recently, R. R. Miller and A. D. Springer (see record 1973-20263-001) proposed that retrograde amnesia is the result of a (usually) reversible retrieval block and not the result of interference with memory storage processes. "Reminder" studies provide the principal data on which their theory is based. The reminder studies are reviewed, as well as other recent studies which are purported to support the retrieval block hypothesis. It is concluded that the findings of these studies are compatible with storage interpretations of retrograde amnesia and have little bearing on the interpretation of retrograde amnesia. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Retrograde amnesia is generally taken as evidence for the disruption of memory storage processes. Recently, R. R. Miller and A. D. Springer (see record 1973-20263-001) proposed that retrograde amnesia is the result of a (usually) reversible retrieval block and not the result of interference with memory storage processes. "Reminder" studies provide the principal data on which their theory is based. The reminder studies are reviewed, as well as other recent studies which are purported to support the retrieval block hypothesis. It is concluded that the findings of these studies are compatible with storage interpretations of retrograde amnesia and have little bearing on the interpretation of retrograde amnesia. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - memory storage disruption vs reversible retrieval block, retrograde amnesia, proposals of R. R. Miller & A. D. Springer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016242429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016242429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0036949

DO - 10.1037/h0036949

M3 - Article

C2 - 4474675

AN - SCOPUS:0016242429

VL - 81

SP - 465

EP - 469

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 5

ER -