Resource geography II: What makes resources political?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalProgress in Human Geography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

geography
resource
resources
politics
political power
territoriality
nation state
fighting
ideology

Keywords

  • nationalism
  • resources
  • state
  • the political

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Resource geography II : What makes resources political? / Huber, Matthew T.

In: Progress in Human Geography, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a067a5af5554783bbed7f259df0eb8a,
title = "Resource geography II: What makes resources political?",
abstract = "What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.",
keywords = "nationalism, resources, state, the political",
author = "Huber, {Matthew T}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0309132518768604",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Progress in Human Geography",
issn = "0309-1325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource geography II

T2 - What makes resources political?

AU - Huber, Matthew T

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.

AB - What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.

KW - nationalism

KW - resources

KW - state

KW - the political

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045630163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045630163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0309132518768604

DO - 10.1177/0309132518768604

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045630163

JO - Progress in Human Geography

JF - Progress in Human Geography

SN - 0309-1325

ER -