Resource geographies I: Valuing nature (or not)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between value and nature has become central to critical resource geography (and other nature-society geography). While research demonstrates the problems with efforts to extend capitalist monetary value to ecosystem services or externalities, few scholars have anchored their critiques in their own theory of value. This report reviews this bourgeoning research through a theory of value anchored in Marxian political economy. Drawing from a few basic postulates, I attempt to fill some gaps and clear up some ambiguities in this research. First, I examine research on environmental valuations schemes (e.g. pricing externalities, or payments for ecosystem services). Marx’s value theory (rooted in abstract labor) can help us to explain why these projects seem so destined for failure. Second, I examine research into how resources and value flow through commodity chains or global production networks. Marx’s focus on labor and abstraction can help us to better understand the violence within these chains toward humans and nonhumans alike. Third, I examine research into the financialization of environmental goods in services. I suggest Marx’s value-theoretical approach to the ‘totality’ of capitalist social relations can better help us to theorize financial capital’s contradictory relationship to value production in the realm of production. I conclude by suggesting a unified theory of value can yield a more radical critique of the diverse failures of capitalism in dealing with our current ecological crisis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)148-159
Number of pages12
JournalProgress in Human Geography
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

geography
resource
resources
Values
ecosystem service
labor
environment crisis
value theory
capitalism
totality
political economy
violence
valuation
commodity
abstraction
Social Relations
capitalist society
pricing
finance
externality

Keywords

  • commodity chains
  • ecosystem services
  • externalities
  • financialization
  • global production networks
  • value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Resource geographies I : Valuing nature (or not). / Huber, Matthew T.

In: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 148-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f631cc4d8d44a318da4368231e27cab,
title = "Resource geographies I: Valuing nature (or not)",
abstract = "The relationship between value and nature has become central to critical resource geography (and other nature-society geography). While research demonstrates the problems with efforts to extend capitalist monetary value to ecosystem services or externalities, few scholars have anchored their critiques in their own theory of value. This report reviews this bourgeoning research through a theory of value anchored in Marxian political economy. Drawing from a few basic postulates, I attempt to fill some gaps and clear up some ambiguities in this research. First, I examine research on environmental valuations schemes (e.g. pricing externalities, or payments for ecosystem services). Marx’s value theory (rooted in abstract labor) can help us to explain why these projects seem so destined for failure. Second, I examine research into how resources and value flow through commodity chains or global production networks. Marx’s focus on labor and abstraction can help us to better understand the violence within these chains toward humans and nonhumans alike. Third, I examine research into the financialization of environmental goods in services. I suggest Marx’s value-theoretical approach to the ‘totality’ of capitalist social relations can better help us to theorize financial capital’s contradictory relationship to value production in the realm of production. I conclude by suggesting a unified theory of value can yield a more radical critique of the diverse failures of capitalism in dealing with our current ecological crisis.",
keywords = "commodity chains, ecosystem services, externalities, financialization, global production networks, value",
author = "Huber, {Matthew T}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0309132516670773",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "148--159",
journal = "Progress in Human Geography",
issn = "0309-1325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource geographies I

T2 - Valuing nature (or not)

AU - Huber, Matthew T

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - The relationship between value and nature has become central to critical resource geography (and other nature-society geography). While research demonstrates the problems with efforts to extend capitalist monetary value to ecosystem services or externalities, few scholars have anchored their critiques in their own theory of value. This report reviews this bourgeoning research through a theory of value anchored in Marxian political economy. Drawing from a few basic postulates, I attempt to fill some gaps and clear up some ambiguities in this research. First, I examine research on environmental valuations schemes (e.g. pricing externalities, or payments for ecosystem services). Marx’s value theory (rooted in abstract labor) can help us to explain why these projects seem so destined for failure. Second, I examine research into how resources and value flow through commodity chains or global production networks. Marx’s focus on labor and abstraction can help us to better understand the violence within these chains toward humans and nonhumans alike. Third, I examine research into the financialization of environmental goods in services. I suggest Marx’s value-theoretical approach to the ‘totality’ of capitalist social relations can better help us to theorize financial capital’s contradictory relationship to value production in the realm of production. I conclude by suggesting a unified theory of value can yield a more radical critique of the diverse failures of capitalism in dealing with our current ecological crisis.

AB - The relationship between value and nature has become central to critical resource geography (and other nature-society geography). While research demonstrates the problems with efforts to extend capitalist monetary value to ecosystem services or externalities, few scholars have anchored their critiques in their own theory of value. This report reviews this bourgeoning research through a theory of value anchored in Marxian political economy. Drawing from a few basic postulates, I attempt to fill some gaps and clear up some ambiguities in this research. First, I examine research on environmental valuations schemes (e.g. pricing externalities, or payments for ecosystem services). Marx’s value theory (rooted in abstract labor) can help us to explain why these projects seem so destined for failure. Second, I examine research into how resources and value flow through commodity chains or global production networks. Marx’s focus on labor and abstraction can help us to better understand the violence within these chains toward humans and nonhumans alike. Third, I examine research into the financialization of environmental goods in services. I suggest Marx’s value-theoretical approach to the ‘totality’ of capitalist social relations can better help us to theorize financial capital’s contradictory relationship to value production in the realm of production. I conclude by suggesting a unified theory of value can yield a more radical critique of the diverse failures of capitalism in dealing with our current ecological crisis.

KW - commodity chains

KW - ecosystem services

KW - externalities

KW - financialization

KW - global production networks

KW - value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040814841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040814841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0309132516670773

DO - 10.1177/0309132516670773

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040814841

VL - 42

SP - 148

EP - 159

JO - Progress in Human Geography

JF - Progress in Human Geography

SN - 0309-1325

IS - 1

ER -