Resiliency and pitfalls of crisis regimes: Reimagining the future of Turkey's democracy through the lens of the Indian Emergency

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Five days after the attempted coup d'état of 15 July 2016, a state of emergency was declared in Turkey. Under the emergency rule, constitutional rights and liberties are suspended and parliament and the courts are reduced to the regime's rubber stamp, while the country is ruled by one man through decrees. While many question how the legal and political developments in Turkey will unfold, and whether and how the democratic backslide and decline in rule of law can be reversed, Indira Gandhi's emergency (1975-77) offers a useful historical heuristic case. With striking similarities to the conditions in Turkey today, during the Indian emergency the judiciary, especially the Indian Supreme Court (ISC), was subjugated to the will of Prime Minister Gandhi through means of constitutional amendments and political appointments that compromised the integrity of justices. Yet, shortly after the end of emergency the ISC regained the trust and respect of the Indian people, thereby playing an instrumental role in the restoration of Indian democracy. Through a close analysis of the Indian emergency rule, the present article explores the conditions of democratic survival and whether and how the Turkish judiciary can reclaim its independence, spearhead a rights revolution, and help restore the democratic order.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-65
Number of pages12
JournalReview of Middle East Studies
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Turkey
regime
judiciary
democracy
Supreme Court
state of emergency
constitutional amendment
statutary order
political development
constitutional state
parliament
restoration
minister
integrity
heuristics
respect
justice
Pitfalls
Emergency
Democracy

Keywords

  • Constitutional amendment
  • Democracy
  • India
  • Judiciary
  • Referendum
  • Turkey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{13c2f53adb4f4bf9a494e15b1ee27a1e,
title = "Resiliency and pitfalls of crisis regimes: Reimagining the future of Turkey's democracy through the lens of the Indian Emergency",
abstract = "Five days after the attempted coup d'{\'e}tat of 15 July 2016, a state of emergency was declared in Turkey. Under the emergency rule, constitutional rights and liberties are suspended and parliament and the courts are reduced to the regime's rubber stamp, while the country is ruled by one man through decrees. While many question how the legal and political developments in Turkey will unfold, and whether and how the democratic backslide and decline in rule of law can be reversed, Indira Gandhi's emergency (1975-77) offers a useful historical heuristic case. With striking similarities to the conditions in Turkey today, during the Indian emergency the judiciary, especially the Indian Supreme Court (ISC), was subjugated to the will of Prime Minister Gandhi through means of constitutional amendments and political appointments that compromised the integrity of justices. Yet, shortly after the end of emergency the ISC regained the trust and respect of the Indian people, thereby playing an instrumental role in the restoration of Indian democracy. Through a close analysis of the Indian emergency rule, the present article explores the conditions of democratic survival and whether and how the Turkish judiciary can reclaim its independence, spearhead a rights revolution, and help restore the democratic order.",
keywords = "Constitutional amendment, Democracy, India, Judiciary, Referendum, Turkey",
author = "Yuksel Sezgin",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/rms.2018.11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "54--65",
journal = "Review of Middle East Studies",
issn = "2151-3481",
publisher = "Middle East Studies Association of North America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resiliency and pitfalls of crisis regimes

T2 - Reimagining the future of Turkey's democracy through the lens of the Indian Emergency

AU - Sezgin, Yuksel

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Five days after the attempted coup d'état of 15 July 2016, a state of emergency was declared in Turkey. Under the emergency rule, constitutional rights and liberties are suspended and parliament and the courts are reduced to the regime's rubber stamp, while the country is ruled by one man through decrees. While many question how the legal and political developments in Turkey will unfold, and whether and how the democratic backslide and decline in rule of law can be reversed, Indira Gandhi's emergency (1975-77) offers a useful historical heuristic case. With striking similarities to the conditions in Turkey today, during the Indian emergency the judiciary, especially the Indian Supreme Court (ISC), was subjugated to the will of Prime Minister Gandhi through means of constitutional amendments and political appointments that compromised the integrity of justices. Yet, shortly after the end of emergency the ISC regained the trust and respect of the Indian people, thereby playing an instrumental role in the restoration of Indian democracy. Through a close analysis of the Indian emergency rule, the present article explores the conditions of democratic survival and whether and how the Turkish judiciary can reclaim its independence, spearhead a rights revolution, and help restore the democratic order.

AB - Five days after the attempted coup d'état of 15 July 2016, a state of emergency was declared in Turkey. Under the emergency rule, constitutional rights and liberties are suspended and parliament and the courts are reduced to the regime's rubber stamp, while the country is ruled by one man through decrees. While many question how the legal and political developments in Turkey will unfold, and whether and how the democratic backslide and decline in rule of law can be reversed, Indira Gandhi's emergency (1975-77) offers a useful historical heuristic case. With striking similarities to the conditions in Turkey today, during the Indian emergency the judiciary, especially the Indian Supreme Court (ISC), was subjugated to the will of Prime Minister Gandhi through means of constitutional amendments and political appointments that compromised the integrity of justices. Yet, shortly after the end of emergency the ISC regained the trust and respect of the Indian people, thereby playing an instrumental role in the restoration of Indian democracy. Through a close analysis of the Indian emergency rule, the present article explores the conditions of democratic survival and whether and how the Turkish judiciary can reclaim its independence, spearhead a rights revolution, and help restore the democratic order.

KW - Constitutional amendment

KW - Democracy

KW - India

KW - Judiciary

KW - Referendum

KW - Turkey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048893569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048893569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/rms.2018.11

DO - 10.1017/rms.2018.11

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048893569

VL - 52

SP - 54

EP - 65

JO - Review of Middle East Studies

JF - Review of Middle East Studies

SN - 2151-3481

IS - 1

ER -